The large dsDNA viruses Phycodnaviridae) that infect unicellular algae are
unusual in a number of respects, including the fact that they have genes
which are only found in eukaryotes, as well as prokaryotes. Entry into host
cells appears to be phage-like; that is they attach to the outside of the
host and inject the viral DNA. My guess is that the Phycodnaviridae will
turn out to be a group of viruses which infect a wide range of protists.
Q | \___
|\ |___\__\ Email: suttle at eos.ubc.ca ;
| \ |_____OO\________ Curtis Suttle
\ BOAT-Eh? o o o o || / Univ of British Columbia
\ VV/ 6270 University Blvd.
~~~~~~\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/~~~~~~~~~~~Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4
Warren Lushia wrote in message <61tm9d$ejd at net.bio.net>...
>Ed Rybicki wrote:
>>>Why do algae have such big dsDNA viruses, while
>> land plants do not? A case of the one that stayed behind developing
>> a new kind of virus? Viral "founder effects"?
>>A big dsDNA virus likely would have a difficult time moving in, through,
>and out the vascular tissue of higher plants; such restrictions may not
>be applicable to algae. In other words, I believe part of the reason
>for higher plants viruses, in general, having relatively small genomes
>is due to the vastly different method of colonization of the host
>compared to, for example, mammalian viruses.
>University of Kentucky
------------ Forwarded Message ends here ------------