IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

Proliferation a good measure of T cell help?

David N. Levy levy at uab.edu
Tue May 27 11:16:15 EST 1997


I have been reviewing the literature on T cell epitopes mapped to viral
proteins, with an interest in finding out what eptitopes have been
shown to stimulate class II restricted T cell help in vivo.  Most
papers use ex vivo T cell proliferation in response to synthetic
peptides as a measure of T helper cell function.  It seems to me that a
tacit assumption is being made that CD8 cells are not contributing to
this proliferation, and my question is: why? and is this a correct
assumption?  Should these results be taken at face value?

If one is immunized in vivo with whole protein antigen (viruses
efficiently stimulate class II and class I restricted cells), then PBMC
are isolated, peptide added and a cell proliferation assay performed,
is this strictly a measure of CD4 cell responses?  Do CD8 memory cells
proliferate poorly or not at all in response to antigen or are they
generally present at a much lower frequency of antigen-specific memory
cells?  Exogneous peptide can be used to map CTL function in
cytotoxicity assays, so both MHC responses should be present, I would
think.

Thanks in advance for correcting my ignorance.


David N. Levy
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL
levy at uab.edu




More information about the Virology mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net