This was originally posted to HIV-biol, but I got no reply ... anyone here??
>One of those things that apparently slips by when an area of
>research (albeit huge) is somewhat afield of one's own area...
>That's the only way I can rationalize the newfound (to ME)
>concept of RNase H being responsible for removing the rna
>after the reverse transcriptase has had its fun, as has now
>been pointed out to me in a couple of very general references.
>The problem is that the references are _very_ general, and the
>putative action of RNase H in this capacity was referred to
>only in figures, as an aside, and not discussed explicitly.
>It makes sense that such a ubiquitous enzyme should interact
>with an RNA/DNA hybrid, but I'd like to know more.....
>>Is RNase H actually involved in the infection process or is
>this another function of the multi-talented RT? Can anyone
>refer me to a good discussion of this topic?? Please respond
>directly to me, as I am not a subscriber to HIV-biol (or virology).
| O==O |
| DAVID G. RHODES O==O PHONE 860-486-5413 |
| SCHOOL OF PHARMACY; U-92 O==O FAX 860-486-4998 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT O==O |
| STORRS, CT 06269-2092 O==O RHODES at UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU |
| O==O |