It is good to see again this arguments. I also very interested in this
problem. During last semester, I studied the issue and found many
interesting argument. But, to save relatively limted number of
patients, we can not put all human population in the danger of new
AIDS like virus transmission. There is no frontier and no visa for
virus. It is evident not only slow virus is problem. How about those
endogenous viruses? I am not only concerned about baboon to human but
also pig to human transplant.
I have two questions. I hope that someone can provide these
information or references (publications) in this post.
First. Is there a federal or international regulation that could
control those potential risky human experimentation (Liver and BM)?
Second. Is there some currently planned xenotransplantation
experimentation including Liver and B.M. (ex. transg. Pigs in England)
Thank you in advance.
Hahn from Brussels
Soo.Hahn at ping.bekmshannon at aol.com (KMShannon) wrote:
>Has anyone read the Aug. 21st issue of The Scientist?
>The front page reads something like this..."As Cross-Species
>Transplantation Forges Ahead, Some Researchers Call for Caution"
>Also, some sociologists might tell you that there are too da*m many people
>on the Earth. How about just letting some die off? Rather than letting
>latent viri (viri in non-human populations) do it for us...
>[You know, when a squirrel becomes sick, the other squirrels gang up on
>the sick fellow and either kill him or run him out of their
>neighborhood...not that I am suggesting reverse-quarantine or killing the
>sick, that was an aside FYI(for your info.)]
>I welcome dialog on this matter,
>Kevin Shannon, The Univ. of Oklahoma
> Internet-->KMShannon at aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu> AOL---> KMShannon at aol.com