> To: virology at net.bio.net> From: RUS-92 at IDA.RUC.DK> Subject: The Ebola virus - the end of the civilized world
> Date: 18 Aug 1995 04:30:25 -0700
> That the Ebola virus is a terrible threat to mankind is undoubtable, but
> i wonder if anybody has thought about the consequences of an epidemic
> disaster in areas with high consentration of population - for example
> central Europe or the eastern coast of the USA.
> Ebola kills 88 percent of the victims, and thus would such a populated
> area be reduced to almost nothing. ...
> Indeed, Ebola is the mightiest threat mankind has faced yet.
I can do no better than to quote you what Dr Margaretha Isaacson - one
of the original 1976 Zaire epidemic medics, and a very senior
virologist in SA - said in an interview with Max Gebhardt, Argus
correspondent (Weekend Argus, Cape Town, August 12/13 1995):
"Ebola...is of absolutely no danger to the world at large. It is a
dangerous virus, but it's relatively rare and quite easily
"The virus needs the right conditions to multiply, whatever the virus
is, be it Ebola or plague. It's not enough to just have the
accident. The virus must first find itself in a favourable
environment before it can affect anyone. The media is scaring the
world out of its wits, and movies like *Outbreak* are doing people a
This, from a woman who worked with patients in Zaire under
horrifically primitive conditions, nearly 20 years ago, when no-one
knew what the pathogen was or how it was spreading.
I would say you - and many others - are being unnecessarily
frightened by a concerted media campaign designed at selling lurid
books and films. Listen - for a change - to what experts tell you,
and react accordingly.
That is, RELAX!!!!!