IUBio

Any comments on this explanation for allergy? (yes, of course :)

Zugumba zugumba at coldsteelandsunshine.org
Tue Jun 15 21:05:22 EST 1999


Hans Lennros wrote in message ...
>Hopefully you are not since you, as a dentist, do it on a daily routin
basis.
>Or at least should, if you are a good one.

Actually, Joel is perfectly correct as far as things go in the US.  A
dentist can lose his license for treating a systemic illness (and face
litigation to boot).  If Joel determined that a patient was suffering from a
migraine and not a dental abscess, his job stops there.  He then is
obligated to refer the patient to a neurologist.

Similarly, removing amalgam restorations to treat a systemic illness (like
multiple sclerosis) is considering treating an illness out of the scope of
dental practice.  Treating a medical emergency is within the scope of the
dentist as far as a dentist is trained.  After a certain point the patient
has to be turned over to the correct medical practitioners to finish the job
or to follow-up.

True, the line can be fuzzy, but most of the time it is pretty clear what
range of ailments a dentist in the US can treat and what he has no legal
right to treat.




More information about the Toxicol mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net