arie at no.mail.thanks.nl wrote:
>On Tue, 01 Jun 1999 23:23:40 GMT, joele at earthlink.net (Joel M. Eichen)
>wrote:
>>"Hans Lennros" <hans.lennros at swipnet.se> wrote:
>>>>>Hi Joel,
>>>>>You said:
>>>>we are to believe the Centers for Disease Control, the
>>>>U.S. Public Health Service and 53 U.S. dental schools.
>>>>So far, no diseases are caused by "mercury fillings."
>>>>>Why not make up your own mind instead of listening to
>>>what you have heard others say. Isn't that hearsay?
>>>>Sorry Hans. No profession works that way. Medical doctors do not "make
>>up their own minds" irrespective of research!
>Sorry, I didn't catch your point, when did the research take place
>that should have proven that applying mercury in amalgam fillings is
>safe?
So far, no diseases are caused by "mercury fillings."
>arie
>>Cheers,
>>>>>>Joel
>>>>-------------------
>>>>I have yet to see one paper that epidemiologically correlates
>>increased mercury from amalgam with any known disease. You have not
>>seen the paper either.
>>>>>As for your information the Centers for Disease Control, the
>>>U.S. Public Health Service and 53 U.S. dental schools
>>>are probably the last bodies to change.
>>>>There's good reasons not to change!
>>>>>BTW; have you ever wondered why the Centers for Disease Control, the
>>>>U.S. Public Health Service have some sort of disclaimers when they
>>>talk about the safety of dental amalgam?
>>>>>Hans
>>>>>>>>
