Good day,
I saw your informative reply in the email list archive in 2004 (pasted in the
end of my email).
Does the situation changed from that time now?
I
want to buy an EEG analyzer software. I googled a little bit and found
BESA, EMSE , g.BS Analyze ,
BrainVision Analyzer 2 , WinEEG version
2.83.42 (MARCH 10).
What is your opinion about these, what is
the best in your opinion. What about others that may be I missed.
How
is open source EEGLAB comparable with them?
Your opinion is very
important for me!
Many thanks
Haider Al-Wasiti, M.D.M.Sc. student - Biomedical Engineering/UPM
wasiti from mutiara.upm.edu.myhayder from wasiti.net
www.wasiti.net
> On 18 Feb 2004 08:42:09 -0800,
> delaflorm at hotmail.com (Manuel Delaflor)
> wrote:
>> } I need 64 channels, all the equipment including software.
> Does someone
> } sells used Neuroscans, for example? I bet there are wat
> cheaper
> } equipments out there, but I dont know anyone.
> }
> } All suggestions welcomed.
>> You can get a new 64 channel BioSemi Active Two EEG system
> for the
> price of a 32 channel Neuroscan system. Technologically it
> is two
> steps beyond anything else.
>>http://www.biosemi.com/>> Definitely do not try the Neuroscan 40 channel
> portable. You might
> find some of those for sale. There are good reasons why
> people would
> want to sell them.
>>> For analysis I recommend BrainVision Analyzer. It does more
> things
> better than any other package available. Also, their tech
> support is
> the best I've found. They're glad to answer questions on
> theory, not
> just on their product, In fact they answered correctly a
> question
> about Neuroscan's analysis algorithm that Neuroscan
> answered
> incorrectly.
>>http://brainproducts.com/index_main.html>>> The US distributor for both of these is Cortech Solutions
> (contact
> info listed on both sites). He'd probably also be the one
> to serve
> Mexico.
>>> An alternative for acquisition and analysis software is
> WinEEG from
> Russia. It's almost as capable as Analyzer, and if you have
> your own
> amps, or find some old Grass amps or something, this would
> probably be
> the cheapest way to start. It's difficult to use though.
> The manual is
> not good at all, and the tech support is poor.
>>> Unless you have the money to pay someone to be a full time
> Matlab
> programmer, I wouldn't waste my time with that. I went that
> route and
> had far more down time than with even the worst commercial
> equipment
> and software.
>>>>>>