Dear Ken,
I have now read this thread.
This is the kind of writing you should be doing!!!
Cut out your declarations of practically useless laments and
over-generalized (but neurotic-
defense-providing for you personally) 'sorrowfulness'. ;-|
I wish you could permanently resolve the neurotically defensive (<=AEVASIVE)
and irrational part of your personality and start to incorporate - into your
uniquely detailed *but as yet* only penultimately unifying picture of What
Is going on - the for fundamental natural reasons *least known* aspect of
our evolution and neuropsychophysiology (the one that I have most centrally
concEPTually captured by "AEVASIVE").
If you did, our two different (but then only by degree of explicit detail)
science-aligend views would get along *really* well! :-)
Other than an absence of religious (and
ought-to-be-self-embarrassing-to-you) ramblings [such as ..."Jesus
knew"...], the by me wished for change would be clearly noticable by a no
longer glaring absence (in your writings) of explicit acknowledgments of the
frequency-triggered (TD E/I up triggered - especially by such "ups" within
the protopathic system) "gating" functions that prevents precariously
pointless actentions (mental and/or behavioral activity) being "paid" to
SHITS and to by such predicaments "put" CURSES (insidious brain states that
normally gets automatically "put" within "Actention Systems" situated in
such predicaments or ordeals).
Wishful thinking is mostly a waste of time - but in my case it at least
tends to be associated with something EPT. ;->
P
"Benjamin" <Benjamin from verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0c3Dh.16073$tQ.1319 from trndny07...
> "Benjamin" <Benjamin from verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:JG1Dh.10059$SR.4918 from trndny06...>> "Benjamin" <Benjamin from verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:jaYCh.7778$am1.5510 from trndny01...>>> [...]
>> [...]
>> "Aw hell!" Please disregard my post,
> linked-to above.
>> I've decided to just 'wing-it'.
>> I want to do other stuff, too.
>> So I'll just do the "easy" version.
>> Just the basics of how to cross-
> correlate TD E/I with nerual to-
> pology. It's for the best, anyway,
> because each "Student" has to
> find their =own= way of doing
> such cross-correlation, and, if
> they want to, do the work, inherent,
> themselves. [It's worth-the-work
> because it enables one to see
> other stuff. But one has to do it
> for one's self. It can't be 'poured-
> in' -- because such doesn't act-
> ually result in the necessary
> 3-D-E Directionalities, which
> are what "learning" is.]
>> I'm just going to give examples
> using the text of AoK, AP3 as an
> "outline."
>> 'You' Direct your own 3-D-E.
>> OK?
>> If folks read anything that they
> want treated in more-detail,
> just ask, and I'll do a "side-
> bar" discussion.
>> Basically, everything I'll discuss
> is already in any Good Neuro-
> anatomy text. All I'll be doing is
> showing how to see TD E/I-min-
> imization [and globally-integrated
> 3-D-E] in the neural topology,
> which is also in the texts, but
> only 'implicitly'.
>> Sorry about my 'flowery' ["Pom-
> pous"] preceding post [I was
> 'pretending' to 'be' that which
> I'm not -- my ["twisted"] 'interpret-
> ation' of a 'professor'. After posting
> the msg, I saw that that way doesn't
> work for me, so I 'tossed' that
> ill-conceived 'plan'.
>> Feel better already.
>> TD E/I-minimization :-]
>> ken [k. p. collins]
>>>
