Unfortunately, other than the problem with Ken's prose (which I don't feel I
have the right to comment about :-> ), the genius that is (in) Ken has also
become seriously set back (and compromised) by his need and inclination to
be religiously "AEVASIVE" (coupled with a concommittant failure to
consistently factor-in evolution theoretical logic as far as the phylogeny
and current of the "AEVASIVE aspect/characteristics" of our genophenotype is
concerned - most especially the religious aspect of AEVASIVE).
[AEVASIVE is an 'insight-extended re-conceptualisation' of the word and
expression "defensive" and "neurotically defensive", respectively. As such,
"AEVASIVE" has a far greater and more balanced depth of thoroughly defined
and implicitly understood meaning than its "conceptual predecessors". You
just have to take my words for it! ;-)]
P