I stand on what =I've= posted.
K. P. Collins
"Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting at OMCL.mil> wrote in message
news:d6ii30t0rb0naveo6u0dgph4qm1g93jlqd at 4ax.com...
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 06:17:17 GMT, "k p Collins"
> <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
>> } Ho, ho, ho.
> }
> } I stand on what =I've= posted.
>> Including telling someone that calculation of correlation dimension
> from an arbitrary time series requires consideration of brain
> topology?
>> } [Hoping that your Ethics at targeting[at]OMCL.mil is
> } better than your posting 'ethics' :-]
>> We've already touched on where I'm at. I don't think we need to
> discuss the nature of ethics with respect to Orbital Mind Control
> Lasers, Inc., do we?
>>> } K. P. Collins
> }
> } "Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting at OMCL.mil> wrote in message
> } news:f6dg301ommds7bcucvjel889d30hc61200 at 4ax.com...> } > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 03:10:23 GMT, "k p Collins"
> } > <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
> } >
> } > } > } I stand on what I've posted.
> } > } >
> } > } > I know. You apparently purposely tried to mislead someone asking a
> } > } > question about calculation of correlation dimension by rattling
off
> } > } > nonsense about the brain. It was wrong. You stand by that, and I
see
> } > } > to that.
> } > }
> } > } No, you don't.
> } >
> } > You're wrong. I'm doing precisely that.
> } >
> } > } You 'see' what you 'presumed'.
> } >
> } > I see that I've cut and pasted your own words from your own messages
> } > and proven you've purposely misled someone by posting extraneous
> } > information as though it were a response to their question. It's all
> } > in the archive. I can do it again. I can ever repost the entire thread
> } > and document each step of your retreat from taking responsibility for
> } > your own words and behavior.
> } >
> } > } 'go away'.
> } >
> } > When you stand on what you've posted and admit that you did what the
> } > evidence shows, we can move on from there. But I'm not going anywhere.
> } >
> }
>
