On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:18:51 GMT, "k p Collins"
<kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
} Anyway, in the future, please retain the entire
} context of any post of mine that you intend to
} 'jump'.
No.
Anyone interested can easily access prior articles either with their
own newsreader or via Google groups. The pertinent message IDs are in
the References: header.
I will not quote and resend extraneous clap trap such as the
irrelevant and obsfucating blabbering about representation and work.
It was a rather infantile attempt to deflect the thread from its prior
direction, which was the fact that you were wrong when you said:
> } Your 'criticisms', quoted below, would
> } only have validity if everything was already
> } known.
You can't stick to the subject when someone asks a question.
You can't stick to the subject when someone tells you to stop that.
You can't stick to the subject when someone proves you're wrong.
I intend to offer you every respect as a rational, self-directed
person, which is to say that rather than assume you have a problem
remaining rational in addition to being exceedingly lacking in
expertise in the subjects you respond to with irrelevant "answers", I
intend to treat you as if you know what you're doing and are doing it
on purpose.