On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:26:29 GMT, "k p Collins"
<kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
} I stand on what I posted.
And I intend to see you continue. However, you'll also be responsible
for it.
} Your 'criticisms', quoted below, would
} only have validity if everything was already
} known.
False. It is not necessary for everything to be know for some things
to be known. If you actually believe your statement, you are engaging
in irrational thought.