Gee, and I was going to cut your "50 years"
down to about 3-4 'days', Dr. Norman.
Guess I'll, at least, transform the way I was
going to do it.
In the future, kindly, allow others to think for
themselves. I mean, speak for yourself, and
allow others to do the same, no?
No 'hard-feelings'. I'm beyond 'hard-feelings'.
k. p. collins
"r norman" <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ngvm20dhocqmnjkm1f984462t1v1l5ntdj at 4ax.com...
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:44:47 GMT, "Glen M. Sizemore"
> <gmsizemore2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >RN: "Perhaps in another 50 years we will all think like [Ken]..."
> >
> >GS: Especially if someone dumps a powerful psychosis-inducing drug into
the
> >water supply.
> >
> >"r norman" <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message
> >news:jd5l20d11nt95du21tr7mitl2fdqsp1rc0 at 4ax.com...> >> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:11:36 GMT, "k p Collins"
> >> <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip virtually all the content>
> >>
> >> >I stand on what I've posted.
> >> >
> >> >[I forwarned that the stuff that I discussed
> >> >in my reply to your post is "too-hot", and
> >> >encouraged you to not reply, so don't be
> >> >'angry' with me. It's just that, where I am,
> >> >Science 'moves toward' Truth.]
> >> >
> >> >Thank You for the work inherent in your
> >> >replying, Dr. Norman.
> >> >
> >> >K. P. Collins
> >> >
> >>
> >> As I said -- I, too, stand on what I've posted. I'll continue with
> >> the "traditional" way of thinking which I believe has served us so
> >> fruitfully for the last 50 years of experimental neurophysiology.
> >> Perhaps you are right. Perhaps in another 50 years we will all think
> >> like you and wonder why we were so dense all those years. But for now
> >> I remain unconvinced.
> >>
>> Who knows? Someday pigs may fly. Someday we will actually find WMD
> in Iraq. Someday (although this one is even less likely) we may be
> teaching about 3-D energy dynamics!
>> As a rapidly aging guy brought up in the Eisenhower era to be polite
> and respectful, I find truly appalling the level of civil discourse
> all too often practiced on news groups. (Not this one so much). I
> think I made it pretty clear that neither I nor anyone else in the
> universe believes his theories. But I didn't feel it necessary to be
> rude about it.
>>>