"Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting at OMCL.mil> wrote in message
news:dunm20pkmshsis92poi69d8avsn34um205 at 4ax.com...
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:49:46 GMT, "k p Collins"
> <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
>> } Hi Peter, Thank You for posting this stuff
> } to which you've referred in the past.
> }
> } All of this is 'just' standard Neuroanatomy,
>> No, it's functional neuroanatomy, outlining and focusing on functions,
> not just locations.
I stand on what I posted, including my
follow-up.
> } most of which has been known since Cajal's
> } huge Accomplishments,
>> So all the references from the 50s and 60s are useless?
> Ramon y Cajal died in 1934.
It was in my point, but, no, all replicable
data is as Gold.
> } and it's all included
> } in explicitly, in the form of a Proof of the
> } TD E/I-minimization Principle, in AoK, Ap3
> } [functional ramifications are discussed in the
> } "Short Paper" section of AoK, and in Ap5,
> } 6 & 7].
>> It is?
I stand on what I posted, including my
follow-up.
> } But what Luria addresses is not the same as
> } what's in AoK.
>> It isn't?
>> It is or it isn't. You said it was (sic) "in explicitly".
>> <snip redundant ken-rant>
I explained what's pertinent, in lengthy
discussion that's occurred between the
OP and me, but you've 'snipped' it,
Falsely terming it a 'rant'.
What can I say?
I stand on what I posted, including my
follow-up.
> } I don't know if you implied, in former msgs, that he
> } did, but Luria didn't say any of this.
>> You're darn tootin'. He made sense.
I stand on what I posted, including my
follow-up.
You're choosing Falsehood, and,
otherwise, being unthinkingly-Offensive.
And using a Taxpayer-funded ID to do so.
'go away'.
K. P. Collins