I'll take it up elsewhere.
ken
"Matthew Kirkcaldie" <Matthew.Kirkcaldie at removethis.newcastle.edu.au> wrote
in message
news:Matthew.Kirkcaldie-F26A57.16244912022004 at tomahawk.comms.unsw.edu.au...
> In article <F9lWb.20378$jH6.13273 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
>> > > The resistance of the circuit varies according
> > > to the frequency of the signal, which emphatically
> > > does not happen with a resistor.
> >
> > "The resistance of the circuit" ...?
> >
> > Are you thinking of "inductive reactance"?
>> Reactance, yes, but if you're going to be clever about it, how about
> "capacitive reactance"? But capacitors are resistors, I forgot. Or are
> they inductors now too?