"r norman" <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jd5l20d11nt95du21tr7mitl2fdqsp1rc0 at 4ax.com...
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:11:36 GMT, "k p Collins"
> <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
>> <snip virtually all the content>
>> >I stand on what I've posted.
> >
> >[I forwarned that the stuff that I discussed
> >in my reply to your post is "too-hot", and
> >encouraged you to not reply, so don't be
> >'angry' with me. It's just that, where I am,
> >Science 'moves toward' Truth.]
> >
> >Thank You for the work inherent in your
> >replying, Dr. Norman.
> >
> >K. P. Collins
> >
>> As I said -- I, too, stand on what I've posted. I'll continue with
> the "traditional" way of thinking which I believe has served us so
> fruitfully for the last 50 years of experimental neurophysiology.
> Perhaps you are right. Perhaps in another 50 years we will all think
> like you and wonder why we were so dense all those years. But for now
> I remain unconvinced.
Works for me.
Cheers, Dr. Norman, ken [k. p. collins]