"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:VkfTb.5909$jH6.4141 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> The plot thickens...
>> Quoting from the =NYT= web site:
>> President to Order Inquiry Into Iraq Intelligence Lapses
> By BRIAN KNOWLTON 5:02 PM ET
> President Bush is expected to issue an
> executive order this week to create a
> blue-ribbon commission to examine
> intelligence lapses surrounding the
> Iraq war.
>> End quote.
>> It's my analysis that the "pre-emption"
> consists of blaming the Intelligence
> Community, and Mr. Kay's state-
> ments were a calculated instantiating-
> prelude to the "pre-emption".
>> K. P. Collins
Recent news accounts have Verified
my Analysis.
The "it's the fault of the Intelligence
Community" stuff is a Calculated effort
to Deceive. 'they' are trying to induce
whole Populations to 'move away from'
Truth.
K. P. Collins
> "k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:VTsSb.2567$jH6.507 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...> > Two articles on the =Washington Post=
> > web site have 'simultaneity' that is extra-
> > ordinarily 'curious'. It's my Analysis that
> > it is Colusion in 'high'-places that under-
> > pins this 'simulteneity'.
> >
> > The dynamics discussed in the Reports
> > smack of "pre-emption" - set-ups re.
> > further dynamics that are yet to be
> > broached.
> >
> > 1. "Hill Probers Fault Iraq Intelligence
> > Panels' Early Findings Are Similar to Kay's
> > By Dana Priest and Walter Pincus
> > Washington Post Staff Writers
> > Friday, January 30, 2004; Page A01"
> >
> >
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61648-2004Jan29.html?nav=hpto
> > p_tb
> >
> > 2. "Inquiry Leaves BBC in Crisis
> > 2nd Official Quits Over Iraq Findings; Journalists Walk Out
> > By Glenn Frankel
> > Washington Post Foreign Service
> > Friday, January 30, 2004; Page A11"
> >
> >
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61701-2004Jan29.html?nav=hpto
> > c_w
> >
> > "`The atmosphere is bleak,' said a
> > member of the staff of 'Today,' the
> > radio news program that first aired
> > the intelligence allegations. `People
> > inside the BBC are desperately anxious
> > that this affair doesn't lead to the
> > unraveling of our independence.'
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > The BBC, which raises most of its
> > funds through a compulsory licensing
> > fee, is overseen by the government.
> > While Ryder serves as temporary BBC
> > chairman, the government will launch
> > a search for a successor, over which
> > Blair will have the final say."
> >
> > It's my Analysis that =part= of what's
> > being 'pre-empted' is the fact that
> > =anyone= who looked, before the
> > War in Irag was launched, could see
> > that, when juxtaposed against the
> > Consequences inherent in going to
> > War - which include having to deal
> > with the explosively-quick "rendering
> > useless" [AoK, Ap8] of the dictaor's
> > iron-fisted control of the Iraqi Citizenry -
> > the 'benefits' of launching the War were
> > not Justified in-Truth.
> >
> > =Anyone= who only looked - who
> > only read the News accounts pertain-
> > ing - could see that, between the op-
> > tions of seeking amplified Diplomacy
> > vs. going to War, it was no contest.
> >
> > The Iraqi dictator, and his upper-'level'
> > cohorts were all seeking raproachment.
> > Yet all of this was 'just' ignored prior
> > to launching the War.
> >
> > It's my Analysis that Administrations
> > in both the U.S.A. and G. B. are, 'now',
> > doing more of the same sort of head-
> > long ['head-strong'] rushing-ahead with
> > old, long-previously-established 'plans',
> > only, 'now', instead of directing their
> > 'pre-emptive strikes' against Iraq, they
> > are directing them against their own
> > Citizenries.
> >
> > K. P. Collins
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>>
