"Peter F" <fell_spamtrap_in at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:%RXzd.164$A33.9382 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
| Hi again Ken,
|| "kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3bXzd.1173031$Gx4.253990 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| > That we know via our Biology in no
| > way delimits that which can be pre-
| > sented to our Biology, for its knowing,
| > via the 3-D energydynamics occurring
| > within the external experiential environ-
| > ments in which we are emersed.
| >
| > And, FWIW, "uncertainty" is a Fiction
| > that derives in folks in Physics not do-
| > ing "the shampoo experiment", and, so,
| > remaining not seeing how continuous
| > energy-flow dynamics can yield indiv-
| > idually-directed sub-dynamics, and, so,
| > 'declaring' the observables correlated
| > to the sub-dynamics to be "everything",
| > when all they are is sub-sets of "every-
| > thing" that are, nevertheless, continuous
| > with, and within, the "everything" :-]
| >
| > Cheers, Peter, ken [K. P. Collins]
| >
| Only from a very in dEPTh and physics oriented overview
| and philosophical perspective of "What Is going on" does
| even a continuum appear jagged -- however quite Tolerably (accEPTably) so.
|| %-)
|| Cheers,
| P
Gee, maybe there's hope for me.
Seems the 'wounds' I've carried
are finally healing-enough to allow
me to glimpse the dEPTh of your
Sense-of-Humor :-]
[Over-and-out for this 'day'. I've
gotta do some stuff offline.]
Cheers, Peter, ken
