"AngleWyrm" <no_spam_anglewyrm at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%0cud.168595$5K2.7505 at attbi_s03...
> "Peter F" <effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> news:fvNtd.43$Al6.1671 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...> >
> > [Can only gamble on the existence of an audience that might accEPT and enjoy
> > my homeopathic doses of etymological "turDgidness"
> > and otherwise 'light-making' (ameliorating of adverse but insight-providing
> > thematic subterfuges of fuzzsilly sem_antics.%-}]
>> IMHO, Proximaty Associations Involving Nonviable Forecasts Ultimately Languish,
> BUT Future Upgrades Nevertheless Necessitate "Y?"
Yes it was either really very humble or humiliating (as if by a boomerang-effect;).
To tell the truth: I am often only decEPTively jocular (or jiving).