IUBio

Devices that read human thought now possible

Allen L. Barker alb at datafilter.com
Tue Nov 11 20:12:02 EST 2003


r norman wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:16:11 GMT, "KP_PC"
> <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi Dr. Norman,
>>
>>I agree with your comments, and have
>>reiteratively discussed why it's so [in my
>>discussions of 'implant' stuff, for instance].
>>Nervous systems are tightly-globally-integrated
>>information-processing systems, so any
>>external 'manipulation' alters the stuff that
>>it would 'manipulate', rendering the intended
>>'goals' of such 'manipulation' always-beyond-
>>reach.
>>
>>Truth is 'somewhere in the middle', though.
>>
> 
> <snip some interesting commentary and personal observations>
> 
> I certainly agree that the US Govenment has been and continues to be
> guilty of all sorts of awful things.  It is just that this mind
> control is not one of them!
> 
> People misunderstand press releases and glowing predictions made by
> people who stand to get a lot of money doing all sorts of strange
> research from actual hard research results.

Mind control has a long and sick history, and is REAL.  Those
who are actually interested in the truth can visit my web pages
at http://www.datafilter.com/mc.

Maybe you'll invite Ken to come and talk to you about his theories
now that he has brown-nosed you and you him.  You know that he
worked out all of neurobiology decades ago.


-- 
Mind Control: TT&P ==> http://www.datafilter.com/mc
Home page: http://www.datafilter.com/alb
Allen Barker




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net