"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:xiVjZWG+6jr$Ewoh at longley.demon.co.uk...
> In article <560167a3d99b2f8e3d36a50b2f9ef9d5 at news.teranews.com>,
> OmegaZero2003 <OmegaZero2003 at yahoo.com> writes
> >> >
> >> >Are you so naive that you do not understand how science progresses?
How
> >it
> >> >is carried out Narcissus?
> >> >
> >> >>
> <DL>
> >> I've spent nearly 30 years in science in one form or another - so yes I
> >> do.
> >
> >Psychologist hardly qualifies.
> >
> <DL>
> >>
> >> The more relevant point was - "Does Ken"?
> >>
> >> Or doesn't *that* matter you self-centred idiot.
> >
> >You are the master of self-centered-ness Narcissus!
> >
> >Besides being a moron that is.
> >
> >
> That's just more irrelevant nonsense - but never mind - if you really
> think that, and you disagree with what I have said - that's fine by me -
> do some homework, and when you have, post something worth reading and
> discussing.
>> What's important here is that none of the things you say about me are
> going to help Ken, or others like him. Whether you picked up on it or
> not - that's what most people would really like to do, and if you looked
> more carefully into what I said, you would have seen something which
> might at least have started something in that direction..
>> So quite independent of any faults I may or may not have (and I have my
> fair share), your interjection so far has just been self-centred and
> unhelpful.
Yet you "help" by telling people that they do not know what they are talking
about, that thousands of neuroscientists are confused and idots, that people
here should just read what you say and dismiss all other POV's because they
are incorrect. Etc,.
>> --
> David Longley