IUBio

Quantum effects in the brain

Franz Heymann Franz.Heymann at btopenworld.com
Thu Jan 9 18:09:47 EST 2003


"Kenneth 'pawl' Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message
news:b2jT9.102982$hK4.8364149 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Franz Heymann wrote in message ...
> |
> |"Kenneth 'pawl' Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in
> |message
> |news:EQbT9.102548$hK4.8330868 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> |> Why not?
> |>
> |> I do it when I realize, after posting the first thing, that
> there's
> |> more that needs to be said with respect to what I'd posted -
> needed
> |> clarification.
> |>
> |> Is there something 'wrong' with doing this?
> |>
> |> I find it unacceptable to withhold info that I've realized is
> |> pertinent, and, in the context of this or that that I've posted,
> |> possibly not obvious.
> |>
> |> Again, why not do so?
> |>
> |
> |On the other hand, snce your posts are invariably meaningless
> drivel,
> |has it not occured to you that it might be easier not to post at
> all?
> |
> |And if you find that impossible, desist from top posting.
> |
> |[...]
>
> The stuff I'm discussing is likely to be unfamiliar to folks, and
> therefore 'difficult'.
>
> That results, within nervous systems of those who're relatively
> ignorant with respect to it, an illusion of there 'being drivel' :-]
>
> You see, Franz, as anything is 'learned' such 'learning' takes the
> form of microscopic trophic [growth] modifications within a nervous
> system.
>
> Until such micromods occur within a nervous system, in a way that's
> rigorously correlated with an information set via neural impulse
> activity that, itself, is rigorously correlated with the information
> set, the nervous system cannot even 'think' a 'thought' that's
> correlated with the information set.
>
> It's what you're experiencing re. what I post, and I suggest you
> either put aside trivialities, like the way I format my posts, and
> work, a bit, to actually comprehend the stuff I'm discussing, or
take
> your own advice and just 'go away', otherwise, all you can do is
> demonstrate your ignorance with respect to the stuff I'm discussing.
>
> Don't take this as a 'put-down'. It's all just in the facts of how
> nervous systems process information, and, therefore, sharing such
> understanding is verifiably the kindest thing that anyone can do for
> another.
>
> 'Course, such seldom 'penetrates' for the first decade or so :-]

Since your posts contain no physics, perhaps you might consider
removing physics from your cross post list.
You would then attract less fire fron physicists.

Franz Heymann





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net