"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:oDiIb.15441$IM3.5478 at newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>> Consider the "twins paradox", for instance.
>> One twin blasts-off for a near-speed-of-light journey,
> while the other stays home. Their "existences" are
> "simultaneous', but the traveling twin returns younger
> than the stay-at-home twin.
>> Where is 'time' wthin such?
>> Nowhere.
>> All that's happened is that, at a WDB2T-Determined
> energy-'consumption' expense [exacted by the accelerating
> force that brings him close to "c"], the traveling twin has
> existed within a locally-augmented energy-gradient, and
> the biological proceses comprising his body have 'just'
> proceded in accord with that augmented energy-gradient.
> Be-cause the energy-gradient is relatively higher than the
> energy-gradient in which the stay-at-home twin has
> existed, the traveling twin's biological processes ex-
> perience relative 'ease' with respect to WDB2T, and
> his body literally ages more-slowly as a result of its
> being emersed within the augmented energy-gradient.
>> Not a smidgeon of 'time' in-there.
>> > See: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~lka/conz2b.htm
Hi Ken,
What is your philosophical/theoretical feeling about the notion (reported
discovery) of negative energy and that it *accelerates* the expansion (WDB2T
dissipation) of our (this) universe.?
P