IUBio

The Neural 4-Space [was Re: Consciousness]

Peter F. effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au
Tue Dec 30 18:36:06 EST 2003


"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:oDiIb.15441$IM3.5478 at newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> Consider the "twins paradox", for instance.
>
> One twin blasts-off for a near-speed-of-light journey,
> while the other stays home. Their "existences" are
> "simultaneous', but the traveling twin returns younger
> than the stay-at-home twin.
>
> Where is 'time' wthin such?
>
> Nowhere.
>
> All that's happened is that, at a WDB2T-Determined
> energy-'consumption' expense [exacted by the accelerating
> force that brings him close to "c"], the traveling twin has
> existed within a locally-augmented energy-gradient, and
> the biological proceses comprising his body have 'just'
> proceded in accord with that augmented energy-gradient.
> Be-cause the energy-gradient is relatively higher than the
> energy-gradient in which the stay-at-home twin has
> existed, the traveling twin's biological processes ex-
> perience relative 'ease' with respect to WDB2T, and
> his body literally ages more-slowly as a result of its
> being emersed within the augmented energy-gradient.
>
> Not a smidgeon of 'time' in-there.
>
> > See: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~lka/conz2b.htm

Hi Ken,

What is your philosophical/theoretical feeling about the notion (reported
discovery) of negative energy and that it *accelerates* the expansion (WDB2T
dissipation) of our (this) universe.?

P





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net