"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<vNgHb.11379$IM3.8926 at newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> Hi 'orkeltatte'.
>> <orkeltatte at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:84da9680.0312261033.626e33ab at posting.google.com...> > "k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:<3ATGb.10009$IM3.6218 at newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> > > <orkeltatte at hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > > > It would be nice with some references to scientific
> > > > studies (if any).
> > >
> > > I have a monograph, "On the Automation of Knowing
> > > within Central Nervous Systems: A Brief Introduction
> > > to Neuroscientific Duality Theory",
> >
> > ................
> > > It sufficiently substantiates the position that I've been
> > > addressing - in terms of the proven Neuroscience
> > > experimental results.
> >
> > So what you are saying is that you have done a double-
> > blind controlled study, with a sufficient number of
> > individuals to draw reliable statistical conclusions from,
> > and you did not get it published in a scientific paper?
>> I don't know whether what's discussed in AoK fits
> nicely into a "double-blind" categorization because,
> frankly, I've never considered it with respect to that
> 'fit'.
>> But the conclusions that are mapped out in AoK are
> Deterministic, and not at all 'statistical' - be-cause they
> derive in the neural Topology [fancy Geometry] that
> has been Proven to exist ubiquitously within Human
> nervous systems.
What are you talking about here - the homunculus?
>> And, as far as I Know [with certainty], no one other
> than myself has ever actually read AoK.
>
One can´t help wonder why?
> When I sent it out, it, typically, was back in my hands
> in three days, which means that some Clerk in the
> Journal's mail room turned it around in the Journal's
> mail room, without allowing it to even be considered
> for Review.
Just for the case of argument -have you ever considered the
possibility that the "AoK does´nt hold water?"
> Then, show me what you understand of "Neuroscientific
> Duality Theory" [NDT], the basics of which are discussed in AoK.
I am just a simple clinician (specialist in Child and Youth psychiatry
and General psychiatry) with some experience and knowledge in
neuropsychiatry ( co-founder amongst 30 others ,of the Swedish
Association of Child and Youth neuropsychiatry) and appointed expert
in psychiatry of the National Board of Health and wellfare. I work
with humans on a hole not just their neurons or the neuronal
architecture , howere interesting and a must know of course .
Good thing you have their answering questions with counterquestions.
orkeltatte