IUBio

question related to Hodgkin-Huxley model

k p Collins kpaulc at [----------]earthlink.net
Wed Dec 24 22:30:05 EST 2003


It's genuinely-hilarious - I got up early this
morning, began the further necessary analysis,
but my 'diet' has been so defficient that, when
I ate some Clementine tangerines that a Generous
Neighbor gave me as a Christmas Gift [I had
about 8 of them :-], whatever's in-them filled-in
at least a portion of my dietary defficiency, and
put me right to sleep :-]

I fought it, and fought it, but after writing out 22
pages of the further analysis, gave in to the 'calling
of my bed.

Tonight, I finished the further analysis, and I'll
post it after I'm finished watching "It's A
Wonderful Life :-]

It is.

Folks won't be disappointed.

ken

"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:mK6Gb.10923$wL6.6315 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> I've not yet got it right, so I RETRACT the statement
> indicated below.
>
> "k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:Zh3Gb.10692$wL6.1849 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> > "r norman" <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:trgguv4mchpeioejapdjv230kettsrecvv at 4ax.com...
> > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 08:04:55 GMT, "k p  Collins"
> > > <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > [...]
>
> I RETRACT  the following statement:
>
> > The action potentials, themselves, are non-information-
> > containing.
> > [...]
>
>  I'll explain tomorrow, after I get some sleep.
>
> k. p. collins
>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net