IUBio

Brain clues to attention disorder

Peter F. effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au
Sun Dec 21 19:40:38 EST 2003


Hi Ken,

Good to see that you are not "turning the other cheek" anymore!

Peter

"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:QbpFb.4198$IM3.1617 at newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> <orkeltatte at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:84da9680.0312210247.4030f84b at posting.google.com...
> > > >The fact that Ritaline and other similar central stimulating drugs
has
> > > >the paradoxal effect of normalizing activity and attention in ADDH
> > > >conditions ,
> > >
> > > It is only paradoxical if we play a bit of word magic with
'stimulating'
> >
> > Sorry! But this is semantic bullshit.Paradoxal refers to an opposite
> > effect compared to the common effect on the majority of people - eg
> > excitatory, increased psychomotor tempo and activity and soforth.
> > [...]
>
> For those who've assess to AoK, see the discussion
> if "inversion" in Ap4.
>
> It's not "paradoxical".
>
> It's 'just' the dynamics of "inversion", uncomprehended,
> by the folks who're pushing drugs with respect to
> behavioral observations pigeon-holed in the nomenclature
> as 'adhd', etc.
>
> If folks could see how 'funny' the absence-of-understanding
> that results in such is, they'd be ROLFL-ing.
>
> If folks could see how Tragic the absence-of-understanding
> that results in such is, they'd be weeping for the Children.
>
> It's so 'interesting' to me that I've gone on and on about the
> dynamics of "inversion" for more than a decade, discussing
> them from many different aspects of their actualization within
> the neural Topology ["functional Neuroanatomy" , but with
> the additional integrating-emphasis of NDT's topological
> integration of neural dynamics], [just the other day, discussing
> them in terms of the generalized "active<->passive phase shift
> and the structural correlates that have been observed] but
> folks remain oblivious to the dynamics of "inversion" and the
> usefulness of NDT's reification of them?
>
> It's as if I exist as some 'alien' Being, in the midst of folks
> who are 'afflicted', and I describe for them how and why
> the 'afflicting' dynamics occur, invoking the Neuroscience
> with which they're all 'familiar', and the stuff I discuss for
> them just 'passes-through' their awarenesses, undetected.
>
> And they 'just' go on inflicting non-sense upon the Children.
>
> How can I say it so as not to 'offend'?
>
> 'Your' absence-of-understanding, even in the face of my
> having 'spelled-things-out' for 'you' for more than a decade,
> leaves my jaw hanging down.
>
> It's like 'you' are a man, fallen over a cliff and dangling from
> a precipice [kind of like Frodo in =The Return of The King=],
> and I 'throw-a-rope' down to 'you', hollering, "Grab `The Rope`",
> and 'you' [kind of like Frodo in =The Return of The King=], re-
> fuse to take it, even though it's the only thing that can lift 'you'
> up out of 'your' absence-of-understanding, in which 'you' are
> mucking around in Children's nervous systems with drugs even
> though 'you' have no comprehension with respect to what's
> going on within the Children's nervous systems.
>
> It's as if, just because 'you' have 'fallen-into-the-abyss', 'you'
> want to drag-the-Children 'down-there' with-'you', rather
> than 'climb-up-out-of' 'your' absence-of-understanding.
>
> What other 'explanation' is there with respect to the way
> everything has been laid-at-'your'-electronic-feet, yet 'you'
> 'move toward' absence-of-understanding and 'move away
> from' understanding.
>
> Look, 'you' have Responsibility.
>
> 'You' =cannot= 'just' dump drugs into Children's nervous
> systems, while 'turning-a-blind-eye' to the functional
> consequences inherent in 'your' dumping of drugs into
> Children's nervous systems, just 'because', when 'you'
> were in graduate [and/or medical] school, 'you' were
> told that "No one knows why [with respect to this or
> that within nervous system functionality]".
>
> You know?
>
> Wake up!
>
> K. P. Collins
>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net