On 13 Dec 2003 06:44:22 -0800, keith wrote:
>"Wolf Kirchmeir" <wwolfkir at sympatico.can> wrote in message news:<jbysxveflzcngvpbpna.hpt54n1.pminews at news1.sympatico.ca>...
>> On 12 Dec 2003 14:57:35 -0800, keith wrote:
>>>> >This seems to be a bald assertion on your part (not that there's
>> >anything wrong with that:-). But why should I think that we wouldn't
>> >understand a revelation made in a non-natural mode?
>>>> Because you couldn't even know it was happening.
>>>This also seems to be a bald assertion. Why do you think we wouldn't
>know if a non-natural revelation were happening?
>>Keith
I'll turn the question back at you: How would you demonstrate that something
were a non-natural event?
--
Wolf Kirchmeir, Blind River ON Canada
"Nature does not deal in rewards or punishments, but only in consequences."
(Robert Ingersoll)
