"Wolf Kirchmeir" <wwolfkir at sympatico.can> wrote in message news:<jbysxveflzcngvpbpna.hpt54n1.pminews at news1.sympatico.ca>...
> On 12 Dec 2003 14:57:35 -0800, keith wrote:
>> >This seems to be a bald assertion on your part (not that there's
> >anything wrong with that:-). But why should I think that we wouldn't
> >understand a revelation made in a non-natural mode?
>> Because you couldn't even know it was happening.
This also seems to be a bald assertion. Why do you think we wouldn't
know if a non-natural revelation were happening?
Keith
