"Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:xqrk9.5853$ls3.1056095 at news20.bellglobal.com...
> "Relayer" <relayer at dreamtheater.zzn.com> wrote in message
> news:lpak9.65632$gA4.22262 at sccrnsc02...> > Parse Tree wrote:
> > > "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote in message
> > > news:746k9.65611$S32.4182275 at news2.west.cox.net...> > >
> > >>"Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:0RPj9.3469$l44.659319 at news20.bellglobal.com...> > >>
> > >>>"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote in message
> > >>>news:0bNj9.60285$S32.3919092 at news2.west.cox.net...> > >>>
> > >>>>"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:v51rougg3ac1qppqf5fc9llgii0hlrtq0s at 4ax.com...> > >>>>
> > >>>>><raugust at ptd.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>You see, for the "six million Jews" that were "killed" in the
> > >>>>>
> > >>>"holocaust"
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>(read my earlier post regarding the real meaning of that word),
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Words mean what we use them to mean. Just as "gay" no longer
refers
> > >>>>>only to how you feel on a bright spring day, holocaust no longer
> > >>>>>refers to the inside of a nuclear explosion. Live with it: the
> > >>>>>language changes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Why don't you live with the definition of RACE? Jews are a RACE.
> > >>>
> > > Live
> > >
> > >>>with
> > >>>
> > >>>>it.
> > >>>
> > >>>Not really. They're just as much a religion as they are a 'race'.
In
> > >>
> > >>fact,
> > >>
> > >>>they don't really have a common history or common physical traits.
> > >>
> > >>They're
> > >>
> > >>>more easily and properly categorized as a religion.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>So you're saying that jews are a class of people unified by a
community
> of
> > >>interests?
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm saying that they're a class of people that are unified by a
> religion.
> > > They are as much a race as are Christians, or Wiccans.
> >
> > I think the race in question (ie the racial stock of most followers of
> > the Jewish faith) would be Hebrew. I could be wrong...
>> The problem with defining them as a race is that people can 'convert'
which
> doesn't make much sense. But I think you'd be right.
>>
That's the theory, but reality and theory are two entirely different things
when it comes to Talmudism. Nobody "converts" to Talmudism except jews, and
jews never "convert" to any other religion (one problem being that the
Talmud calls for the death penalty for jews who are baptized unless they do
it to deceive Christians).
http://christianparty.net/talmud.htm
jews are a race first and a religion last. The religion is what made it
possible for them to retain enough of their lineage to still be considered a
race. They're not a pure race because they've always miscegenated with
other races, like the Ethiopians and the Khazars.
John Knight