"BradHAWK" <BradHAWK at tourette.net> wrote in message
news:3D8ECA75.732ED731 at tourette.net...
> John Knight wrote:
> >
> > "Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
> <snip>
> > > ANSWER =>
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey, I'll make it easer -- forget the food laws, perhaps these are
> > > just too hard -- how about laws handed down by YWH on clothing?
> > > Beards? If you accidentally touch an unclean animal, do you bring a
> > > lamb or goat to be sacrificed? Provide olive oil for the lamps?
> > >
> > >
> > > ANSWER =>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please do remember, someone on this group once wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The Holy Bible isn't a smorgasbord where you get to pick and
> > > choose the parts you want, and throw out the rest.
> > >
> > > -- cary
> >
> > What is it about "liberals" that they never seem to be able to
understand
> > the concept of "public debate" or "social commentary" or "Biblical
> > exegesis", and instead must diddle with little personal niglets all the
> > time?
> >
> > Do you have any idea, cary, how many opportunities to address the key
issues
> > you've blown just because you can't get your head out?
> >
> > One person's "opinion" has nada, nothing, zero, zilch, to do with
presenting
> > the *facts* about the relationship between brain size, intelligence, and
> > religion, nor with critiquing the theories being presented.
> >
> > If you can't follow it, why waste your time with it?
> >
> > John Knight
>> These sound like the words of someone who just lost an
> argument (especially considering how far he was willing to
> go before suddenly calling for topic).
>> BradHAWK
Just between us girls, declining to exchange personal anecdotes with someone
who hasn't even demonstrated the most fundamental understanding of the Holy
Bible can't be considered "lost an argument".
Cary is so far out in *left* field that it's a waste of breath to even begin
to try.
John Knight
