IUBio

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight jwknight at polbox.com
Sun Sep 15 23:26:15 EST 2002




"grey" <not at available.com> wrote in message
news:fms6ou0eanij3mcqo0ro07ko7b0qev3fbf at 4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2002 17:10:27 GMT, "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"josX" <joshb at mraha.kitenet.net> wrote in message
> >news:aluqrb$4k0$1 at news1.xs4all.nl...
> >> mentifex at scn.org (Arthur T. Murray) wrote:
> >> >dd at dandrake.com (Dan Drake) wrote:
> >> >>> [...] Einstein was born in Ulm and reared by Germans,
> >> >>> but did he marry a Yugoslav, or what nationality?
> >> >>
> >> >>[...] Yes, his first wife, Mileva Maric, was Serbian.
> >> >>(Yugoslavia had not been invented at that time.)
> >> >
> >> >What happened to Einstein's brain after his death?
> >> >Was it in any way unusual, apart from being awfully smart?
> >>
> >> Do not post religious articles about prophets or philosophy to
> >> sci.physics. Thanks. Einstein was not a phycisist, he was a
> >> philosophyst and a crank.
> >> --
> >> jos
> >
> >And an idiot, plagiarist, LIAR, STUPID, math moron, college drop, without
> >colleagues who "dreamed" up things White men published 1-2 decades
earlier,
> >and never cited.
> >
> >It's truly embarassing that so many Americans bought this LIE.
> >http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm
>
> Wow, this sounds like a wacky one. Let's get rational, here, folks.


Are you suggesting that it's not rational to point out that Einstein was a
PLAGIARIST?

How much lower can a "scientist" get than to steal works that were published
1-2 decades earlier by others and fail to acknowledge the source?
http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm

John Knight





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net