"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
>news:efvfquovd2l46qvs99k11vhmhgp1g46789 at 4ax.com...>> "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>> >The majority of Europeans were OPPOSED to WWII.
>>>> I'm sure. But Hitler's troops didn't exactly give most of them a
>>Precisely the point. And the exact same thing is now happening in the US
>with this "war" on Iraq, and it's being orchestrated by the SAME enemy
>foreign power which got us into WWII.
Japan? Not likely.
You do remember Pearl Harbor, don't you.
>> >Three quarters of Americans were OPPOSED to the US entering WWII.
>>>> Not on the day after Pearl Harbor. And note that Germany declared war
>> on the US.
>>How do you know? Because you believe a government which you KNOW LIES to
There are historical records in *many* countries indicating that
Germany declared war on the US a couple of days after Pearl Harbor.
We did not need to declare war on Germany.
>On top of that, it's fairly well documented that the jews orchestrated Pearl
>Harbor in order to convince Americans to enter a war we shouldn't have
So now you claim that the Jews were in charge of the Japanese
>> >The vast majority of the rest of the world were opposed to it,
>>>> I'm sure, but the Japanese did not give the Chinese, the Koreans and
>> the southeast Asians a choice.
>>Another war which wouldn't have happened if Jacob Schiff, an "American"
>"banker" [read: a JEW] hadn't funded both sides of the Russo-Japanese War.
What does that have to do with the Japanese invasion of China?
>> >just as the vast majority of most citizens around
>> >the world are opposed to us attacking Iraq. 70% of Americans believe the
>> >state of the US economy is more important than a "war" with Iraq
>>>> The Democrats would love this to be true.
>>Even the "news" media polls show this to be true, but the private polls show
>99% of Americans OPPOSED to this "war".
You mean your nincompoop poll that only you vote on?