Lance O. Lake <hammer at stakepounders.us> wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:34:01 -0500, Jd wrote
>(in message <3d9cdd4d.2164572 at news1.lig.bellsouth.net>):
>>> Bob LeChevalier <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote:
>>>>>JDay123 at BellSouth.com (Jd) wrote:
>>>> Not only that, but apparently 48 million Christians dying doesn't
>>>> seem to register in Bob's conscience.
>>>>>> There is no support for the nincompoop's "48 million Christians" other
>>> than to assume that every non-Jew killed in WWII was a Christian,
>>> which ignores that most of Japan and China are non-Christian. But the
>>> issue is not MY conscience; I am quite bothered by the millions of
>>> non-Jews who died in WW-II. But for the most part, they were not
>>> killed by a special attempt to exterminate a so-called "race". (The
>>> gypsies (Rom) were also targeted by the Nazi's but there are less
>>> accurate numbers for how many there were and how many died - probably
>>> between 200,000 and a million).
>>>>>> But even if 48 million Christians died, they did not die from an
>>> attempt to systematically exterminate them. Wars are horrible and too
>>> many people die in them. But no one denies that millions died in
>>> WWII, whereas the nincompoop (and perhaps you as well) deny the deaths
>>> of the Holocaust.
>>>> I've yet to deny anything about WWII. It's reasonable to conclude
>> however, that if someone can be held accountable for ~6 million
>> deaths in one race, that someone can be held accountable for 48
>> million deaths in another. That is if one looks at the issue
>> objectively.
>>>> Jd
>>>>>>>Absolutely.
>>And isn't it convenient that it was the same psychotic pervert?
>>Lance
If one is looking for convenient answers, yes.
Jd