"Dan Holzman" <holzman at panix.com> wrote in message
news:andh5v$1hm$1 at panix2.panix.com...
> In article <Nypm9.3430$zz2.779420 at news20.bellglobal.com>,
> Parse Tree <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >There's caucazoid, mongoloid and such. And it certainly is biological.
>> There is no scientific basis to those categories. To the extent that
> they were once presented as "biological," they have been debunked.
Isn't that like essentially stating there is no biological basis for
different skin colour and different facial structure?