Ian Stirling <root at mauve.demon.co.uk> writes:
> Stephen H. Westin <westin*nospam at graphics.cornell.edu> wrote:
> > "Neil" <neil_delver at hotmail.com> writes:
> > <snip>
> >> The point I want to make is how interesting it is that we experience
> >> those "fundamental looking" colors, which don't "appear" mixed with
> >> Indeed, from that point of view, we really have four primary
> >> colors since yellow doesn't look like it's made of red and green -
> >> we don't call any colors "reddish-green" etc.
> > But from a mathematical point of view, three dimensions are sufficient
> > to describe normal human color perception, since it all is mediated by
> > three kinds of cones.
>> The rods have a significantly different peak than the green peak, IIRC,
> 520nm, rather than 550nm.
>> In normal (scoptic) vision, are the rods totally saturated?
As I recall, they aren't so much saturated most of the time as they
are drowned out.
> Do they contribute at all to scoptic vision?
Not so you'd notice.
> What about the sense of colour?
Not at all.
Really, there are two different vision mechanisms: photopic includes
color, and scotopic doesn't. Not at all. The mesopic is kinda
interesting, as it uses bits of both.
-Stephen H. Westin
Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not
represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.