But my post was perfectly apropos to both you and Ken. Neither of you can
say anything that appears to be more than a word salad. Also, there is the
issue of both of your pitiful, affected, writing styles. Ken with
his....hell, I don't even know what to call it, and you with your insipid
acronyms expressing your mostly incomprehensible sophomoric bullshit.
"PF" <fell_spamtrap_in at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:k9U19.7862$Cq.347845 at ozemail.com.au...
> "Glen M. Sizemore" <gmsizemore2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3d4806c9$1_5 at news.teranews.com...> >
> > I'm pretty sure that he meant to say:
> >
> > "TD neural activation drives the E/I-minimized modifications because
> > neuronal trophic activation 'reflects' diverse experience in a
> > commensurately-diverse neural fashion, which, in a microscopic way,
> actually
> > occurs more ways among them, which simultaneously preserves and
generates
> > commensurately diverse neuronal survival-conducive microscopic
> modifications
> > in relatively-more neurons, that allows convergence to occur."
> >
>> In recognition of Glen M Sizemore [or Less] perhaps I should have asked,
why
> a humorless and partially psychopathic also-run (e.g., one such as you
> appear to be) keeps on keeping on.
>>>>
