IUBio

Nils Lundberg -swedish newly dead neuorscientist

Kenneth Collins k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Wed Jul 31 09:54:55 EST 2002


hi, Peter.

the stand i've taken with respect to the Teaching of Jesus is as i've
described it.

believe it or not my Faith is actually very private. i prefer to just
be 'alone' with God. has to do with my self-knowledge.

it's just that, through my own experience, i became, i'm sure, in
only a small way, familiar with what the Human 'side' of what Jesus
experienced, and decided to take a stand on His behalf, because i
understood the take-your-breath-away Sorrow inherent.

it's as i've said - Ethics.

when i saw that all the important stuff within NDT was just stuff
that Jesus so gently reached-out to 'humanity' with, i'd've been a
Plagerist and a Selfish-Coward if i'd not acknowledged Jesus'
Priority.

Jesus poured Himself out.

and 'science' is 'two' uppity to acknowledge what's in-there - even
though the need for exactly what's in-there is great?

doesn't compute, especially when everyone in Science is expected to
be honorably-vigilant with respect to Priority.

i understand the knee-jerk 'don't-talk-about-religion' stuff, but
what i'm doing is =just= simple Ethics. one doesn't 'deny', 'usurp',
'distort', etc., the work of others. one finds one's own problem on
which to work. and if one finds that someone else did-it before him,
then, one acknowledges Priority.

besides, if i understand how much hurts, then, to the degree of such
understanding, it'd be a pathetic statement with respect to myself if
i didn't take such a stand.

so i do.

i understand that it's 'Hard', and i don't expect anyone else to
understand. and do expect folks to 'have-a-field-day' with such,
especially those who want to see me 'committed', anyway.

it's just that i understand, understand?

i take-seriously that which i understand.

explore it.

hammer-on-it.

discard what's extraneous.

leaving only that which is 'immovable'.

solid-foundation stuff.

makes all the difference with respect to understanding-more, because
it 'outlaws' 'wisful-thinging-fantasy' stuff.

"born-again"?

i just 'went-along-for-the-ride' until it 'knocked-me-off-my-horse'
:-)

seems to me it was always in-there.

'dormant'.

just needed to be Awakened.

Cheers, Peter, and Thank You for what you do, and for how long you've
done-it. i still hope to make it to Austrailia before i'm through
with Living. just can't see my way there, yet. if i make it, i'll buy
you a Faawstaas.

ken

PF wrote in message <2VR19.7831$Cq.346765 at ozemail.com.au>...
>
>"Kenneth Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>news:sFQ19.16274$Kl6.1013820 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> being 'newly-dead', myself, i can't help.
>>
>> k. p. collins
>
>It seem to me you are more of a not quite brain-dead "born-again"
Christian.
>;-)
>
>Peter
>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net