IUBio

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Thalamus zhil at online.no
Tue Jul 30 10:39:55 EST 2002


"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> skrev i melding
news:Ivx19.44193$Fq6.3967852 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > > This is a real hoot, Brian.  Part of understanding this problem is
> > > understanding the ENGLISH language, which cary proved that she can't.
> >
> > Of course I am correct.
> > Unlike them I am on the spiraling ladder to Godhood, and one condition
is
> > that you'll have to shed the flesh.
> > http://www.transtopia.org
> >
> > Brian
> > PS. Your Christian God was a great crutch, but it is time to lay away
the
> > crutch as the old tool has served it's purpose.
> > It's time to evolve.
>
> Well, thanks for the offer, Brian, but we'll have to let you know when
we've
> got an opening for another God );

One should be his/her own God.
I don't care to much about the libbies, they'll spiral themselves downward
to their own demise.

> In the interim, your expertise in probability and statistics could be very
> useful in setting the record straight regarding multiple choice questions.
> Is there anything you'd like to add about this?

Well, we could open it up by looking at the culturally neutral IQ-tests with
multiple choice.
Personally I have completed what is called the 'Ravens Matrix Standard
Test', and it involves several choices for each question.
The questions involved are purely geometrical, something even the retards
should be able to understand that it is culturally neutral.
Each multiple choices is not exactly 'wrong' but involves a degree of
rightness vs. wrongness, and they can measure through your choices exactly
which level your IQ is centered.
IE; A person goes through question 1. and answers it correctly, the same for
question 2,3,4,5 and 7, then he misses on 6,8,9 and 10.
We can see just at WHICH question he begin to miss, where his IQ-level is
set (question 6), and it might reflect a bad draw, different thinking; and
thus  we end up judging that the borderline is 'fuzzy' (as he chose correct
on question 7).
Second level of judgement is when we go into detail and see which choice he
actually made, the degree of rightness, as the questions will become harder
and harder to get correct (IE 100% on 1, 95% on 2 etc.)
And when the level of correctness reaches zero, that is when we have hit his
borderline, his maximum level of intelligence.
Maybe you'll understand what I'm saying, I doubt the semi-tards will :-)
It's quite simple.

Brian





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net