IUBio

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Thalamus zhil at online.no
Tue Jul 30 08:34:41 EST 2002


"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> skrev i melding
news:VVo19.42401$Fq6.3863731 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > > In article <8ko09.28058$Fq6.2865116 at news2.west.cox.net> "John Knight"
> > <johnknight at usa.com> writes:
> > > Only if you believe that:
> > >
> > >         S = at^2
> > >
> > > (check any physics book; he was wrong)
> >
> > It was like this, retard:
> >
> > F=m(v/t) - a=(v-v0)/t - a is acceleration,v is velocity, t is time, F is
> > force
> >
> > t=mv/F - exchanging t with F, see the likeness of the equations ??
> >
> > t=mv/ma - insert ma instead of F (F=ma)
> > t=v/a - shorten the thing, by dispatching off with m (mass).
> > t=(S/t)/a - here's the tricky part, insert S/t instead of v (S=vt or in
my
> > opinion v=S/t).
> > t=(S/ta) - shorten the whole thing, so it is elegant.
> > t²=(S/a) - transfer t to one side of the equation, and voila !!
> > t=sqr(S/a) - you have Brian's equation of time, height and acceleration.
> It
> > was Galileo who discovered the whole ting, the equation says that the
time
> > for a mass to fall is dependent on TWO things, acceleration and height,
> NOT
> > mass (which Galileo discovered).
> >
> > You loose, I win - as I am a Superior White God, and you're just a silly
> > feminine creature :-)
>
> Not only did Brian do the math correctly, Cary--he got the correct answer,
> which you never did!
>
> This is a real hoot, Brian.  Part of understanding this problem is
> understanding the ENGLISH language, which cary proved that she can't.

Of course I am correct.
Unlike them I am on the spiraling ladder to Godhood, and one condition is
that you'll have to shed the flesh.
http://www.transtopia.org

Brian
PS. Your Christian God was a great crutch, but it is time to lay away the
crutch as the old tool has served it's purpose.
It's time to evolve.





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net