"Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> wrote in message
news:xSl19.3937$Py1.69178 at news2.ulv.nextra.no...
> "Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> skrev i melding
> news:ai4m4i$q2n$1 at oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...> > In article <8ko09.28058$Fq6.2865116 at news2.west.cox.net> "John Knight"
> <johnknight at usa.com> writes:
> > Only if you believe that:
> >
> > S = at^2
> >
> > (check any physics book; he was wrong)
>> It was like this, retard:
>> F=m(v/t) - a=(v-v0)/t - a is acceleration,v is velocity, t is time, F is
> force
>> t=mv/F - exchanging t with F, see the likeness of the equations ??
>> t=mv/ma - insert ma instead of F (F=ma)
> t=v/a - shorten the thing, by dispatching off with m (mass).
> t=(S/t)/a - here's the tricky part, insert S/t instead of v (S=vt or in my
> opinion v=S/t).
> t=(S/ta) - shorten the whole thing, so it is elegant.
> t²=(S/a) - transfer t to one side of the equation, and voila !!
> t=sqr(S/a) - you have Brian's equation of time, height and acceleration.
It
> was Galileo who discovered the whole ting, the equation says that the time
> for a mass to fall is dependent on TWO things, acceleration and height,
NOT
> mass (which Galileo discovered).
>> You loose, I win - as I am a Superior White God, and you're just a silly
> feminine creature :-)
>> Brian
>>>
Not only did Brian do the math correctly, Cary--he got the correct answer,
which you never did!
This is a real hoot, Brian. Part of understanding this problem is
understanding the ENGLISH language, which cary proved that she can't.
John Knight
