"Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> skrev i melding
news:ai4m4i$q2n$1 at oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...
> In article <8ko09.28058$Fq6.2865116 at news2.west.cox.net> "John Knight"
<johnknight at usa.com> writes:
> Only if you believe that:
>> S = at^2
>> (check any physics book; he was wrong)
It was like this, retard:
F=m(v/t) - a=(v-v0)/t - a is acceleration,v is velocity, t is time, F is
force
t=mv/F - exchanging t with F, see the likeness of the equations ??
t=mv/ma - insert ma instead of F (F=ma)
t=v/a - shorten the thing, by dispatching off with m (mass).
t=(S/t)/a - here's the tricky part, insert S/t instead of v (S=vt or in my
opinion v=S/t).
t=(S/ta) - shorten the whole thing, so it is elegant.
t²=(S/a) - transfer t to one side of the equation, and voila !!
t=sqr(S/a) - you have Brian's equation of time, height and acceleration. It
was Galileo who discovered the whole ting, the equation says that the time
for a mass to fall is dependent on TWO things, acceleration and height, NOT
mass (which Galileo discovered).
You loose, I win - as I am a Superior White God, and you're just a silly
feminine creature :-)
Brian
