"Shadow Dancer" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
news:ahrtl1$vamk5$1 at ID-150265.news.dfncis.de...
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:eme09.25512$Fq6.2721104 at news2.west.cox.net...> > "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:5Xs_8.11402$o7.2411397 at news20.bellglobal.com...> >
> > > > Congratulations for failing to figure this out. The Japanese love
it.
> > > > Through patriarchy, Japanese women rose to family incomes twice ours
> > from
> > > a
> > > > fifth of ours just 4 decades ago. This 10x swing was mostly because
> of
> > > our
> > > > drop in fortunes rather than their dramatic increase.
> > >
> > > This is not true. Japan had immense economic growth. A 10x swing
being
> > > blamed on America's decline could only exist if families were broken
> into
> > > more than 2 parts. Are you suggesting that there are no dual income
> > > families, let alone two parent families, and that the first born of
> every
> > > family starts working as soon as they're out of the womb?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This mythology that "dual income families" improved anything or
increased
> > family incomes is a cruel joke, and the joke's on you feminazis.
> >
> > The mostly one income families in the US in 1970 had household
purchasing
> > power THREE TIMES what these "dual income families" have today. The
> > Japanese households which earn two and three times our "dual income
> > families" today are almost exclusively one income families. Where's the
> > beef?
> >
> > Why? Because it requires the positive productivity of 8 male workers in
> the
> > American labor force just to make up for the negative productivity of
one
> > female worker. There's no other way this could happen.
> >
> > John Knight
> >
>> Provide references, and not from the christian party site.
>>
Sorry, all requests for free research (which we now understand to be so
neccessary when ONE THIRD ...) must be funneled through The Christian Party.
But you're in luck--the urls at http://christianparty.net/familyincomes.htm
are direct references to the original FEDERAL data (which because of CYA may
not be the most accurate, but it
will put you in the ballpark).
John Knight
