In alt.education Re: brain sizes: Einstein's and women's,
Bob LeChevalier wrote...
>I disagree with your opinion, because I know many Jews, and I know of no
>particular reason why a Jew would pose as a Christian in order to act against
>Christianity. Now the JEWS as a people feel that "Jews for Jesus" are
>Christians posing as Jews in order to subvert Judaism (and Jewish families).
>But there is nothing in their religion compelling Jews to try to convert or
>subvert Christianity - they just would rather be left alone and not
>evangelized.
Fine. You disagreed and stated why in a rational manner.
>>I know of many people who believe that Christianity is something different
>from what you appear to believe it is. I don't believe that anyone but God
>is authorized to judge what is in our hearts, which is what determines
>whether we are saved through Christ. Therefore I must assume that a person
>who says they are a Christian IS a Christian though he may be a sinner like
>all of us in a particular sinful practice or statement that I do not myself
>accept as being Christian. Only explicit denial of Christ's divinity is
>sufficient for me to reject someone who says he is a Christian as not really
>being Christian (e.g. Thomas Jefferson), and even then I don't presume that
>God approves of my making that judgement.
Can't argue with that.
>Finally, I have seen no "imposters" whose opinions I have applauded. The
>nincompoop is the only person I have reason to believe MIGHT be an imposter
>(because his arguments seem so out of touch with reality that they could be
>an elaborate put-on).
Looks like you have selective amnesia because you've forgotton
Angilions pot smoking Jesus.
[snip]
>>I think you liberals would take away free speech if
>>it were possible, and only allowing cursing, obscenities, and porno
>>movies.
>>Since you by your wording damn me as a "liberal" in the above despite my
>denial of that political bent, I assert that YOU have "cursed" - you have
>called me a name that you clearly associate with antichrist, and thus called
>me in league with Satan. I can imagine no worse a curse than that.
You may very well be under a curse.
[snip]
>>>>> 3) Jews always point to the Hebrew language as if it's icing on the
>>>>cake when making a point. Believe me, I've encountered this many
>>>>times
>>>>>>Does that mean that John Knight is a Jew, since he often pulls out his
>>>Strong's and misuses a Hebrew word in trying to make a point?
>>>>No. Jews will tell you that the requirement for being Jewish is to
>>have a Jewish mother. I can assure you, Mr. Knight doesn't have a
>>Jewish mother.
>>Do you know his mother? Do you even know his real name? How can you make
>such assurances?
How can you say that I can't?
[snip]
>>The Hebrew languange ploy they use is just that, a ploy. Jews use
>>that ploy to bluff unwary gentiles (in religious discussions) into
>>thinking that translational errors keep them (gentiles) from
>>discovering truth.
>>But the nincompoop has used PRECISELY that ploy. And I can recall no one
>else in this thread who has done so except in regard to the Talmud (which
>isn't entirely in Hebrew, so I've been told, so there are Hebrew scholars (I
>have one visiting me right now in fact) who cannot read all of the Talmud in
>the original language.
I think you're obsessed with destroying John Knight.
[snip]
>>Now below, I've re-quoted what Angilion said. See if you can catch
>>the subtle Hebrew language ploy... along with the error:
>>>>Angilion said...
>>>> "The reason they refer to Hebrew is because it's the language
>>used for the Old Testament of the Bible and the language used in
>>Jesus' lifetime, where he lived."
>>>>...see that? The language they used in Jesus' lifetime wasn't even
>>Hebrew way back then, it was Hellenistic Greek (which is different
>>from classical Greek).
>>In the Holy Land, it was Aramaic and Hebrew and Latin and Greek, each by
>different people at different times for different purposes. There is no
>particular reason to believe that Jesus spoke any languages other than
>Aramaic (spoken in Nazereth) and Hebrew (spoken in the temple).
So is that a "yeah" or a "nea" for Angilions (website) claim of a
pot smoking Jesus who was annointed with some ancient Hebrew form of
canabonolis holy oil?
Jd
