"Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:_Q109.9209$DN4.1701428 at news20.bellglobal.com...
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:lE109.23236$Fq6.2520918 at news2.west.cox.net...> >
> > "The 9th Witch" <appalachian_witch at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:ahpnbl$vc54o$1 at ID-131540.news.dfncis.de...> > >
> > > John Knight <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> > > news:qCY%8.20847$Fq6.2438003 at news2.west.cox.net...> > > >
> > > > "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:JjC%8.10452$sb5.1054617 at news20.bellglobal.com...> > >
> > > >
> > > > Again, it's your "opinion" that the questions were "ambiguous", but
> the
> > > > simple fact is that you can't argue they weren't as clear as a bell
to
> > > those
> > > > who understood the problem, can you?
> > > >
> > > > So is H04 "ambiguous", or is it just that missing 3 1/2 billion
brain
> > > cells
> > > > makes it seem that way?
> > >
> > > Parse Tree is a man, you stupid FUCK.
> >
> > Impossible! Not even pathetically feminized men are this bad. Not even
> > estrogen drenched, steroid pumped, ritalin packed male graduates of our
> > feminized "school" system are this bad.
>> I think you're just a tad upset that I PROVED that your probabilities were
> wrong.
>>
This is the way women "think", not men. Why would a man possibly be upset
if you accidentally succeeded in setting the record straight? The fact is
that a major objective of this forum is to purposefully set the record
straight.
Even so, you did not prove a durn thing about probabilities. All you did
was demonstrate how and why 100% of American girls and half of American boys
are either incapable of comprehending it, or were never even taught it in
the first place.
John Knight
