"The 9th Witch" <appalachian_witch at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ahpnbl$vc54o$1 at ID-131540.news.dfncis.de...
>> John Knight <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:qCY%8.20847$Fq6.2438003 at news2.west.cox.net...> >
> > "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:JjC%8.10452$sb5.1054617 at news20.bellglobal.com...>> >
> > Again, it's your "opinion" that the questions were "ambiguous", but the
> > simple fact is that you can't argue they weren't as clear as a bell to
> those
> > who understood the problem, can you?
> >
> > So is H04 "ambiguous", or is it just that missing 3 1/2 billion brain
> cells
> > makes it seem that way?
>> Parse Tree is a man, you stupid FUCK.
Impossible! Not even pathetically feminized men are this bad. Not even
estrogen drenched, steroid pumped, ritalin packed male graduates of our
feminized "school" system are this bad.
John Knight
>> >
> > You were even given the correct answer, and you STILL thought it's
> > "ambiguous", so the answer to the question about what it takes to
educate
> > the uneducable is: it cannot be done.
> >
> > Hopefully you realize that you can't change the laws of physics by just
> > claiming they're "ambiguous", right?
> >
> > We're not starting from scratch with this question, right? You've had
> > plenty of time for it to sink in, and it still seems "ambiguous" to you,
> > right? You can't argue that the 54% of Swedish boys who got it right
did
> so
> > just by guessing, or that this was a question which they'd naturally
learn
> > because of the Swedish environment (excluding the academic and
> intellectual
> > environment, that is), or that they'd agree with you that it was
> > "ambiguous", right?
> >
> > It was primarily because you "made certain assumptions in [your] answer"
> > that you can't get it right now, which is a clue about why American
girls
> > did so poorly on tests like this.
> >
> > Here's the $64 million question: if American girls were taught the
WRONG
> > thing in classrooms, then why were the 43% of American boys sitting
right
> > next to them taught the RIGHT thing? And, of course, why were so many
> more
> > boys from other countries (which spend far less than us for education as
a
> %
> > of GDP) taught the correct thing?
> >
> > The answer is that it has nothing to do with the classroom, at all.
This
> is
> > a problem that 12 year old boys work out on their own, with no help at
all
> > from their female teachers who "think" it's just as "ambiguous" as you
do.
> >
> > American fathers and their children have had plenty of teachers like
that,
> > and those "teachers" are as wrong as the day is long, aren't they?
> >
> > Girls don't usually think about things like this, and when they
try--they
> > always flub it, just as every one of the girls on this forum just did.
> >
> > John Knight
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>>
