brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

[John Knight]

"The WhiteDragon©" <server57.5 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uk15msro5doo64 at corp.supernews.com...
>
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:c1X%8.20223$Fq6.2421034 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:zHJ%8.10681$sb5.1206492 at news20.bellglobal.com...
> > > "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> > > news:beJ%8.18111$Fq6.2230257 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > > > "Elisabeth Frauendorfer" <ef25147 at i-one.at> wrote in message
> > > > news:3d3b132c at news.i-one.at...
> > > > > I believe that intelligence and creativity, inventivity (?) does
not
> > > > depend
> > > > > on the SIZE but the FUNCTION of the brain....
> > > > > And on how you maintain the "hardware" (brain) biochemically, and
> how
> > > you
> > > > > use the "software" (intellectual knowledge) in a kognitive way.
> > > Includes
> > > > > being broadminded and open to new ideas and new paths.
> > > > > Einstein was a creative genius, but he had a little brain when
> > compared
> > > to
> > > > > many rather average individuals that lived at the same time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Elisabeth
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Einstein made up for having a little brain by being a BIG LIAR, and
> > > > plagiarist.  Everything this idiot who flunked algebra and never
even
> > had
> > > a
> > > > lab of his own ever wrote had been published by the White guys in
> Europe
> > > > with the big brains 10-20 years earlier.
> > >
> > > This simply isn't true.
> > >
> > > Explain what you think of his was a rehash.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > "rehash"?
> >
> > Sheesh,
> >
> > John Knight
>
> In the information you posted is one clear point made.
>
> "The Yilmaz theory applies the principles of the Einstein General theory
of
> Relativity, and so is not a different theory; it is a refinement of the
> Einstein theory. "
>
>
> Get it ?
>
> Because of computers, we have been able to modify and/or/prove Einstein's
> theories.
>
> IOW, he was way ahead of his time.
>
> http://www.olduniverse.com

Einstein was a moron, which is why he flunked math, never had a laboratory
of his own before the "invented" the theory of relativity, had to STEAL
every paper he ever "wrote" from White European men who published it all 1
or 2 decades before he claimed it was his, never once attributed his real
sources.

This was a CRIME pattern, not an act of genius.

He couldn't even quote his sources properly, which is why there were so many
errors in "his" papers, and why the theories of the original inventors and
developers have been proven to be correct and his have been proven to be
wrong.

The simple act of leaving off an attribution on a scientific paper is
*incredibly* suspicious, wouldn't you say?  The fact that every time he
didn't copy it word for word, he made serious errors, is a CRIME.

John Knight