"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:c1X%8.20223$Fq6.2421034 at news2.west.cox.net...
> "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:zHJ%8.10681$sb5.1206492 at news20.bellglobal.com...> > "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> > news:beJ%8.18111$Fq6.2230257 at news2.west.cox.net...> > > "Elisabeth Frauendorfer" <ef25147 at i-one.at> wrote in message
> > > news:3d3b132c at news.i-one.at...> > > > I believe that intelligence and creativity, inventivity (?) does not
> > > depend
> > > > on the SIZE but the FUNCTION of the brain....
> > > > And on how you maintain the "hardware" (brain) biochemically, and
how
> > you
> > > > use the "software" (intellectual knowledge) in a kognitive way.
> > Includes
> > > > being broadminded and open to new ideas and new paths.
> > > > Einstein was a creative genius, but he had a little brain when
> compared
> > to
> > > > many rather average individuals that lived at the same time.
> > > >
> > > > Elisabeth
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Einstein made up for having a little brain by being a BIG LIAR, and
> > > plagiarist. Everything this idiot who flunked algebra and never even
> had
> > a
> > > lab of his own ever wrote had been published by the White guys in
Europe
> > > with the big brains 10-20 years earlier.
> >
> > This simply isn't true.
> >
> > Explain what you think of his was a rehash.
> >
> >
>> "rehash"?
>> Sheesh,
>> John Knight
In the information you posted is one clear point made.
"The Yilmaz theory applies the principles of the Einstein General theory of
Relativity, and so is not a different theory; it is a refinement of the
Einstein theory. "
Get it ?
Because of computers, we have been able to modify and/or/prove Einstein's
theories.
IOW, he was way ahead of his time.
http://www.olduniverse.com
>>>>>>>>>http://www.crank.net/einstein.html>>>> Primordiality 2002 May 27
> ... physics . consciousness . quantum mechanics . Einstein was wrong
.
> metaphysics ...
> "When I was twelve years old, late one night while struggling through my
> homework with the gods of general math and Euclidean geometry, it came to
> me. I drew an equilateral triangle and then another inverted inside of the
> first and I immediately saw that the inverted triangle was exactly one
half
> the size of the first and so I drew another inside of that and then
another.
> I then drew a circle around each triangle and then quite unexpectedly,
like
> an electrical flash, Zeno's Paradox rent my linear thought asunder to
reveal
> in all of its elliptical glory a vortex of irrational numbers and every
> element of the attractive and opposing relationships between Space, Time,
> Matter, Energy and Motion. From that time forward I found no rest ..the
> quest of a lifetime had begun."
>>> The Speed of Gravity: What the Experts Say 2002 Apr 21
> ... gravitation . Einstein was wrong ...
> "Standard experimental techniques exist to determine the propagation speed
> of forces. When we apply these techniques to gravity, they all yield
> propagation speeds too great to measure, substantially faster than
> lightspeed. This is because gravity, in contrast to light, has no
detectable
> aberration or propagation delay for its action, even for cases (such as
> binary pulsars) where sources of gravity accelerate significantly during
the
> light time from source to target By contrast, the finite propagation speed
> of light causes radiation pressure forces to have a non-radial component
> causing orbits to decay (the 'Poynting-Robertson effect'); but gravity has
> no counterpart force proportional to v/c to first order. General
relativity
> explains these features by suggesting that gravitation (unlike
> electromagnetic forces) is a pure geometric effect of curved space-time,
not
> a force of nature that propagates. Gravitational radiation, which surely
> does propagate at lightspeed but is a fifth order effect in v/c, is too
> small to play a role in explaining this difference in behavior between
> gravity and ordinary forces of nature."
>>> Unified Spiral Field and Matter 2002 Jan 21
> ... relativity . electromagnetism . Einstein was wrong ...
> "The spiral field theory described in this website explains the unity of
> field and matter by using rather basic mathematics that is taught in high
> school. It also presents field and matter in beautiful geometrical forms
> that can instantly be visualized. To enjoy these outstanding features of
the
> spiral field theory, the reader must be ready to abandon the well-known
> relativistic equations of the theory of relativity for mass and electric
> charge ... and to accept the totally new relativistic equations. The main
> two features of these new equations are: 1. Both the gravitational mass mg
> and inertial mass mi of a particle decrease as its velocity v increases:
...
> 2. Electric charge e of a particle decreases as its velocity v increases:
> ... You may not be prepared to abandon immediately the century-old
> relativistic equations. But once you are ready to do so, you will discover
> many amazing things ..."
>>> The Absolute Present 2001 Nov 18
> ... relativity . Einstein was wrong ...
> "More than an intuitive nonsense, Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity,
> it would seem, legitimised a century of stupidity. A stupidity typified by
> schizophrenic, ghosting, time dependent, self-replicating, psychic
> 'god-like' particles; singularities; space-time warps and imaginary time.
If
> sensibility is to be restored, then Science must exorcise the spooks,
> God-rationalists, and writers of science fiction that riddle modern
> theoretical physics. Provocative conjecture indeed. The motivation for
such
> conjecture has root in the ultimate beauty of simplicity -- the analysis
of
> the empirical data in the context of a new 'intuitive' theoretical model.
> Consequently, this work is not so much about an ultimate objective truth
of
> physical theory or the philosophy of time, but is more a quest for
> re-evaluation in the face of esoteric, complex theories founded upon the
> 'near mystical.'"
>>> All My Files 2001 Oct 09
> ... metaphysics . technology . relativity . Einstein was wrong .
> physics . mathematics ...
> "The Dark Matter mystery ... Modifications of the strong nuclear force by
> the action of the zero-point force ... Einstein's twin paradox revisited
...
> Non-accelerated 'twin paradox' ... Single best argument against special
> relativity ... Simple challenge to supporters of special relativity ...
> Short reductio ad absurdum refutation of special relativity ... Another
> simple argument against special relativity ... Logical invalidity of
> Einstein's 'train' thought experiment ... Do the Lorentz transformations
> even do what they were intended to do? ... Does the Michelson-Morley
> experiment really indicate that the speed of light is a constant? ... Can
> mass really increase with velocity ... ? ... Contradiction between the
> special and general theories of relativity ... A short and sweet
refutation
> of Gödel's theorem ..." In PDF, Word, and RTF formats.
>>> The Einstein Conspiracy 2001 Oct 09
> ... relativity . Einstein was wrong . conspiracy ...
> "I have researched relativity theory and written a book ... The book deals
> with my maths investigation of orthodox physics, this Web site goes beyond
> the book. There is now no need to look at the maths of orthodox physics to
> show it to be wrong, because its history can be shown to be a myth."
>>> Quotes Direct from the Brain Trust Videos 2001 Aug 11
> ... gravitation . Einstein was wrong . megalomaniacs . bizarre ...
> "Gravity as Newton and Einstein knew it does not exist. You have to go
back
> at least 15 years when they put gravitometers down oil wells about six
miles
> deep to test the gravitational constant at that level. According to Newton
> and Einstein, it should be a certain specific quantity or within a small
> range. In fact, they found out that there is something like a hundred
times
> as much gravity and that's ridiculous, they said. When the United States
> launched the first space probe it kept going off course. Well, it took
them
> awhile to re-analyze all the evidence and what they came up with is that
> gravity does not exist in space as they thought it did -- there's less
than
> 1percent of the amount of gravity that there should be. So gravity as
Newton
> and Einstein knew it works from about five miles under the earth up to
about
> three-hundred miles above the earth. Thus, gravity is not what anyone ever
> thought it to be."
>>> Time-Line-Theory 2001 Aug 11
> ... Einstein was wrong . relativity ...
> "This theory is to say matter of the universe has a constant time (speed)
to
> it. Matter can't go slower than the time constant for matter, but it can
go
> faster than the time constant. For every 1 mile matter moves in the
> universe, time moves 3647 miles."
>>> Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics 2001 Aug 11
> ... relativity . Einstein was wrong . conspiracy ...
> "Nothing can move in spacetime! By definition! ... Are we being taken to
the
> cleaners by spacetime physicists? Some of the most famous physicists in
the
> world are not telling the truth about one of the most taken for granted
> concepts in scientific history. They are not telling us how they can come
up
> with their fanciful time-traveling theories (wormholes, advanced and
> retarded waves traveling in spacetime, etc...) using a model of the
universe
> that precludes the possibility of motion. Nothing can move in spacetime or
> in a time dimension-axis by definition. This is because motion in time is
> self-referential. It is for this reason that Sir Karl Popper compared
> Einstein's spacetime to Parmenide's unchanging block universe, in which
> nothing ever happens. The following is a short list of notorious time
travel
> and spacetime crackpots, not necessarily in order of crackpottery. Some,
> like Hawking, Wheeler and Feynman, are venerated by the physics community
> and are considered by many to be among the most brilliant scientific minds
> that ever lived. Too bad they believe in time travel."
>>> The Theory of Absolute Space-Time 2001 Jul 21
> ... Einstein was wrong . relativity . aether . quantum mechanics .
> grand unification ...
> "The discovery of errors in our measurement of a constant speed of light
and
> in the logic of the Michelson-Morley experiment leads to a complete
> refutation of Einstein's [relativity's] curved space-time. Proof of
absolute
> space-time within 'our' universe leads to linear and finite dimensions of
> space-time. Theoretical physics leads us to quantum gravity and a grand
> unified theory. A quantum particle 'theory of everything.' The speed of
> light is no longer a travel speed restriction."
>>> Yun-Qi Kingdom 2001 Jun 10
> ... science . physics . mathematics . relativity . Einstein was wrong
.
> hoaxes . paranormal . astronomy . gravitation . metaphysics . conspiracy .
> bizarre . new age ...
> "When the new millennium begins, a great NEW KINGDOM also comes. It marks
> the END of SCIENCE. No matter whether you believe or not, no matter if you
> want or not, this is already a fact, and will definitely become the
reality
> in the very near future. Actually, my first article 'Yun-Qi Kingdom --
> Fundamental One' obviously has very well put today's PHYSICS into the DEAD
> END. Students, teachers and professors who have a solid background of
> mathematics and/or physics can easily examine what I say by yourselves. If
> you think my first article does not sufficiently shake down today's
> MATHEMATICS, my second incoming article 'Yun-Qi Kingdom -- Fundamental
Two'
> will clearly show you that the MATHEMATICS we have used for centuries is
> also considerably and lawlessly WRONG. Please do not use today's knowledge
> as your prejudices to cut immediately what I have said down. Try to
> investigate it first. I hope one can beat Yun-Qi Kingdom down by using
> today's science and knowledge, but I'll be afraid to say that NOBODY CAN."
>>> Big Bang and Black Hole [sic] are Science Fiction 2001 Feb 05
> ... Big Bang . gravitation . Einstein was wrong ...
> "The Yilmaz theory of gravity is an extension of the Einstein general
theory
> of relativity. Since 1958, Prof. Huseyin Yilmaz has published numerous
> papers on his theory in prestigious scientific journals. The Einstein
theory
> has a flaw that was not apparent during Einstein's lifetime. The Yilmaz
> theory has corrected this flaw, and has thereby eliminated the
'singularity'
> concept of the big bang and black hole, which Einstein strongly opposed.
> This website explains the Einstein and Yilmaz theories in a simple
physical
> manner that is scientifically accurate. The Yilmaz theory yields a
radically
> new explanation for the Hubble expansion of the universe. The theory
> predicts that relativistic effects due to gravity distort space in such a
> manner that the universe expands locally about every point, yet the
overall
> size of the universe does not change. The theory predicts a universe with
a
> constant size and an infinite age, which appears to be eternally young
> because it is continually changing."
>>> Did Einstein cheat? 2000 Nov 18
> ... Einstein was wrong . crankology ...
> "If you're tired of hearing about creationists and the war against
> Darwinism, you might be surprised to learn that another pillar of modern
> science, Einstein and his theory of relativity, is under attack. An
> underground of 'dissident' scientists and self-described experts publish
> their theories in newsletters and on the Web, exchanging ideas in a great
> battle against 'the temple of relativity.' According to these critics,
> relativity is not only wrong, it's an affront to common sense, and its
> creator, Albert Einstein, was a cheat."
>>> Gravity as resistance to heat flow 2000 Aug 13
> ... Einstein was wrong . thermodynamics ...
> "A heat-based gravity theory has been developed in order to account for a
> number of anomalies related to the mass-based gravity theories of Newton
and
> Einstein. A fundamental assumption of this theory that the gravitational
> force will come into being whenever heat flows through curved surface like
a
> hemisphere. This idea has been tested in the laboratory."
>>> Flaws in the Logic of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity 2000 Jun 04
> ... Einstein was wrong ...
> "Scientific theories usually sprout from experiment-based logical grounds.
> New theories must replace the existing ones if they do not agree with the
> results of experiments. A new theory has to be in full agreement with the
> fundamental laws of nature and it has to include in itself the old theory
as
> an exception. Therefore, if the new theory's logic is flawed then the
theory
> itself must be wrong. Let us use this premise to examine Einstein's
Special
> Theory of Relativity."
>>> Paul Marmet: List of Papers and Web Sites 2000 May 05
> ... Einstein was wrong . Big Bang . cosmology . quantum mechanics ...
> "Einstein's theory of relativity versus classical mechanics ... A detailed
> classical description of the advance of the perihelion of Mercury ...
> Absurdities in modern physics: A solution ... Big Bang cosmology meets an
> astronomical death ... The origin of the 3 K radiation ... Quantum
mechanics
> and its paradox ... Non-Doppler redshift of some galactic objects ...
> Incompatibility between Einstein's general relativity and the principle of
> equivalence ... Cosmic matter and the nonexpanding Universe ... The 3 K
> microwave background and Olbers' paradox ... The cosmological constant and
> the redshift of quasars ..."
>>> New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector 2000 Mar
01
> ... Einstein was wrong . electromagnetism ...
> "In special relativity, Einstein introduced two postulates: The first
> postulate is that the speed of light is invariant for all inertial
> observers. In this theory, unlike in relativity, we use a Euclidean metric
> to describe spacetime, leading to a redefinition of the invariance of the
> speed of light in terms of a four-vector, rather than a three-vector. The
> second postulate of relativity is that the laws of physics are the same
for
> all inertial observers. This requires that the laws have a covariant form
> under a Lorentz transformation between inertial reference frames. Our
> intention is to show that the Lorentz equations are incomplete. Since
these
> equations are used to determine the covariance of the laws of physics, any
> change in their form requires a change in the form and scope of these
laws.
> We will introduce the new version of the Lorentz transformation equations
> and some of its consequences."
>>> Beyond the Farthest Star 2000 Jan 10
> ... Einstein was wrong . electromagnetism ...
> "'Beauty is truth, truth beauty, that is all ye know on earth, and all ye
> need to know.' If the poet is right, the book Beyond the Farthest Star is
> the most beautiful book ever written. Considering firty [sic] years of
> opposition to anything sennsible [sic], it is to be hoped that the book
will
> set the record straight. In terms of the future of mankind, the present
> system based on the work of Euclik [sic], Galileo, Newton, and Einstein is
> fatally flawed. Present physics can be trusted for mechanical velocities
but
> diverges from reality beyond one tenth the velocity of light."
>>> Galilean Electrodynamics 1999 Nov 26
> ... Einstein was wrong . periodicals ...
> "... aims to publish high-quality scientific papers that discuss
challenges
> to accepted orthodoxy in physics, especially in the realm of relativity
> theory, both special and general. In particular, the journal seeks papers
> arguing that Einstein's theories are unnecessarily complicated, have been
> confirmed only in a narrow sector of physics, lead to logical
> contradictions, and are unable to derive results that must be postulated,
> though they are derivable by classical methods."
>>> Caroline Thompson's Physics 1999 Nov 04
> ... Einstein was wrong . quantum mechanics . physics ...
> "... is about what is wrong with fundamental physics. It started with the
> discovery that we have been misled. We have been told that experiments
agree
> with all the predictions of quantum theory, including those that involve
the
> impossible -- the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments, that are supposed
to
> show totally incomprehensible effects of separated particles on each
other.
> I have looked at the evidence. ... I am led to suggest that perhaps there
is
> other currently-accepted 'evidence' for both quantum theory and Einstein's
> relativity theories that needs re-investigation. I am not talking of
> 're-interpretation,' but of recognizing that if we want to understand
> nature, not just produce 'predictions,' the first step is to re-assess the
> facts, reject falsehoods."
>>> Plank [sic] units 1999 Oct 29
> ... Einstein was wrong . quantum mechanics . electromagnetism .
> medicine ...
> "The theory of gravitation of the Newton-Einstein [sic] may be incorrect
...
> Fundamental Plank [sic] particles ... Photon has closed world ... The
nature
> of physical vacuum ... The birth and evolution of the Universe ... The
cause
> of cancer ..."
>>> Flat Space Society 1999 Oct 12
> ... Einstein was wrong . gravitation ...
> "This society is modelled on the 'Flat Earth Society.' Einstein is to
blame
> for starting all this 'curved space' talk. Everybody knows space is
'flat.'
> Newton and Einstein didn't know what gravity is, and nobody knows to this
> day. ... Use Riemannian curved geometry, but that still doesn't explain
the
> real physical mechanism of gravity. I maintain space is 'flat' (Newtonian)
> and we'd better start finding out what gravity really is, especially if we
> want to find a better way of defeating it to accomplish realistic space
> travel."
>>> Einstein Is Really Wrong! 1999 Aug 21
> ... Einstein was wrong ...
> "This Web site is intended to be an additional means to help the few
> intelligent physicists in the world who battle against the injustified
> religious primacy among the scientific community of the logically
impossible
> relativistic Einstein's theories [sic]."
>>> Weight, Inertia, & Gravity 1999 May 27
> ... gravitation . Einstein was wrong ...
> In forming his The General Theory of Relativity, Albert Einstein used his
> famous thought experiments to justify his postulate that Inertia and
Gravity
> are equivalent. Although they are closely related they are not equivalent.
> Inertia is a requirement of space. Gravity is one of the primary forces of
> nature that fulfils this requirement. The force of gravity arises from the
> "mass" created by the Inertial requirement of Space. One of the ideas that
> misled Einstein to his conclusion was that a body dropped in an
accelerating
> elevator behaved in exactly the same manner as it would if dropped on the
> surface of Earth. Actually, the effects, in both cases, are similar but
not
> exactly the same. The truth is, Gravity causes bodies, dropped from
various
> heights in the room resting on the ground, to fall at different rates of
> acceleration where as, all bodies in the accelerating elevator "fall" at
the
> same rate. Also they do not "fall" parallel to each other under the
> influence of gravity as they do in an accelerating room.
>>> The Society for the Advancement of Autodynanmics 1999 May 27
> ... Einstein was wrong . relativity ...
> "In 1940, a young future physicist from Argentina came across a paradox in
> Einstein's Special Relativity that lead him to discover a theory of
physics
> that Einstein came close to, but never found: a theory he called
> 'Autodynamics.'"
>>> Einstein and Relativity 1999 May 27
> ... Einstein was wrong ...
> "It is clear to me that Mr. Einstein's special theory of relativity is
> flawed because of faulty reasoning. Now there are those who will say that
I
> am speaking nonsense because Mr. Einstein's theory has been 'proven' over
> and over again."
>>>
