If the stuff on the bottom of this page would be true, he would not be
hailed as one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century.
Here is a page with some REAL citations - Albert Einstein Online:
http://www.westegg.com/einstein/
You've now confirmed one thing, John Knight. You're a Nazi. When did you
become a member of the party and did you know that Nazis do not believe in
Jesus?
The Shadow Dancer
"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:aVW%8.20199$Fq6.2417460 at news2.west.cox.net...
> "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:zHJ%8.10681$sb5.1206492 at news20.bellglobal.com...> > "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> > news:beJ%8.18111$Fq6.2230257 at news2.west.cox.net...> > > "Elisabeth Frauendorfer" <ef25147 at i-one.at> wrote in message
> > > news:3d3b132c at news.i-one.at...> > > > I believe that intelligence and creativity, inventivity (?) does not
> > > depend
> > > > on the SIZE but the FUNCTION of the brain....
> > > > And on how you maintain the "hardware" (brain) biochemically, and
how
> > you
> > > > use the "software" (intellectual knowledge) in a kognitive way.
> > Includes
> > > > being broadminded and open to new ideas and new paths.
> > > > Einstein was a creative genius, but he had a little brain when
> compared
> > to
> > > > many rather average individuals that lived at the same time.
> > > >
> > > > Elisabeth
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Einstein made up for having a little brain by being a BIG LIAR, and
> > > plagiarist. Everything this idiot who flunked algebra and never even
> had
> > a
> > > lab of his own ever wrote had been published by the White guys in
Europe
> > > with the big brains 10-20 years earlier.
> >
> > This simply isn't true.
> >
> > Explain what you think of his was a rehash.
> >
> >
>> "rehash"? You call PLAGIARISM a "rehash".
>> Is "rehash" a crime? No. Is PLAGIARISM? YES.
>> John Knight
>>>http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm>> Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
>> by Dr. Paul Bowers, B.S., M.E., Ch.D.
>> One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish
media
> is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
>> "The great masses of people ... will more easily fall victims to a big lie
> than to a small one."
>> Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray this
> statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But if we read
> this selection in context, we find that he is speaking of the Jews who had
> ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how the German people fell
> victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler even tells us what this great
> lie is that duped the German people into being controlled by the Jews. He
> continues:
>> "Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the application
> of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the Jews; for their
> entire existence is built on one single great lie, namely, that here one
had
> to deal with a religious brotherhood, while in fact one has to deal with a
> race - what a race! As such they have been nailed down forever, in an
> eternally correct sentence of fundamental truth, by one of the greatest
> minds of mankind; he called them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does
> not realize this or does not want to believe this will never be able to
help
> truth to victory in this world."
>> Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th century
> German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true nature of Jews. We
> do not need to rely upon the opinions of German philosophers and political
> leaders regarding this character trait of the Jews, for Jesus Christ has
> said of the Jews,
>> "You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your father
you
> wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and he has not
stood
> in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he
> speaks of his own, because he is a liar, and the father of it" (John 8:44
> AST).
>> Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing myths"
> (Titus 1:14). But Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed Germany and what
> have destroyed America today. Herr Hitler may have been correct in what he
> felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there are many, many more which have
> had a damning effect on the white race. One of the greatest is certainly
the
> lie of the Hebrew Masoretic Text and the removal of the Greek Septuagint
> from the hands of white Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the
> same poisonous venom. One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is
> Albert Einstein.
>> Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who
> drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is made
an
> idol to young people and his very name has become synonymous with genius.
> The truth, however, is very different. The reality is that Einstein was an
> inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he
contributed
> nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics or any other science,
but
> on the contrary he stole the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made
> him a hero.
>> When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his
only
> brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other people's
ideas,
> passing them off as his own.
>> Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story.
> The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he
> "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15,
> "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school
with
> no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of
> imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple
> entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich. This exam consisted
mainly
> of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically
> inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a
> stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after
> graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering
> school! Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with
the
> help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical
> expert third class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher
> qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called groundbreaking
> papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he
was
> only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing
at
> the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not
quantum
> mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents
for
> patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.
>> He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously
> trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of
these
> facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth. Supposedly, while working
a
> full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of
graduate
> students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an
> academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking
> essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were
> published in 1905. Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a
> feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to
> believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the
blue,
> because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly
> inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any
> real education. However, a simpler explanation exists: he stole the ideas
> and plagiarized the papers.
>> Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of
> each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's
> worshippers as totally new and completely different, each of which would
> change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the
following
> four ideas, respectively:
>> 1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
> 2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
> 3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
> 4. The special theory of relativity.
> Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity.
> This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein.
> Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special
> Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915). This theory
> contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two
> premises: 1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the
same
> for all observers; and 2) since the speed of light is independent of the
> motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer
> for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different
> places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur
in
> the same place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as
> one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower
velocities
> where time would pass faster.
>> This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for
> modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally
> Einstein's. First of all, the idea that the speed of light was a constant
> and was independent of the motion of its source was not Einstein's at all,
> but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James Maxwell. Maxwell studied
> the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was
> electromagnetic in nature. He wrote an article to this effect for the 1878
> edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate,
and
> by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific
> community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the
> conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of
the
> observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known
27
> years before Einstein wrote his paper.
>> This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to
> conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be
explained
> by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity
but
> they did not understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the
motion
> of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for
> the propagation of light.
>> In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George
FitzGerald,
> who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a
> paper which stated that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment
could
> be explained if,
>> "... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving
> through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the square of
the
> ratio of their velocities to that of light."
>> This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper! [Note:
> see critique]
>> Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed the
> same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the
> 1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote
articles
> strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known
> as the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor
> wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its
> relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904,
Lorentz
> transformations, the series of equations explaining relativity, were
> published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening
of
> length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the
> velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper
> regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.
>> The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of
these
> ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,
>> "... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals.
> The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well
as
> the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the
> statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."
>> Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the
> similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein. Thus we
see
> that the only thing original about the paper was the term 'Special Theory
of
> Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over the next few years,
> Poincaré became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding
> relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned
Albert
> Einstein. Thus, while Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic
> world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the
> patent office in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it
> necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of
these
> early physicists knew that he was a fraud.
>> This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of
another
> of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion
of
> a body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in
> which the body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the
> Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this phenomenon
> has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American
Josiah
> Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this
occurrence,
> not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the
> motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men,
> they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper
> regarding Brownian motion.
>> The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third
> paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the
famous
> equation E=mc^2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most
famous
> and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious
> conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in
> that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still,
> the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.
>> That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in
the
> laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W.
Kaufmann
> in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass
relationship
> for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most
> probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of
the
> most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the
> teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for
a
> variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass
and
> energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in
the
> very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in
> 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenörhl had received in 1904
a
> prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.
>> Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple
> deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist
James
> Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship
> expressed by the equation E=mc^2 was the logical result of Maxwell's work,
> they just did not believe it. Thus, the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann,
> and finally, and most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. It
> is ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this postulate,
particularly
> in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary
to
> conduct the appropriate experiments.
>> In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the
> scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory
> using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g.,
salts
> of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about
> science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein
> showed that he really did not understand basic scientific principles and
> that he was writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in
> response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies
> beyond the realm of possible experience."
>> The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation
of
> the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect.
> The photoelectric effect is the release of electrons from certain metals
or
> semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is
particularly
> important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he
> unjustly received his 1922 Nobel Prize.
>> But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who deserve
> the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he
> is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets
> called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric effect. The
> photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz
and
> others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon.
> Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in
> the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light
but
> by the frequency of the light. This was an important breakthrough.
>> Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day
> quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had
> shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called
> quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of
1905
> was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one particular type of
> energy - light energy. But the principles and equations governing the
> process in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself
> admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's work was that light also
> existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of
> Einstein's was original.
>> After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community
> took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office
until
> 1909 when it was arranged for him to take a position at a school by World
> Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919 newspaper headline that he gained
any
> notoriety.
>> With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position
> where he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly. He
> engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories he had
> supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could
> present the research as his own or at least take partial credit. In this
> vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in
> terms of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to
> understanding relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory of
> Relativity, which he would publish in 1915. But the mathematical work was
> not done by Einstein - he was incapable of it. Instead, it was performed
by
> the mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical
> principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a
> sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics used
to
> describe relativity.
>> The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to
the
> universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits,
> and the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive
> object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work
> which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this
> paper was filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect. It
appears
> that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So
> Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory.
> Einstein published his correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and
> said prior to its publication that he, "...completely succeeded in
> convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps
the
> most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another
> mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area of
> calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of
Relativity
> for Einstein.
>> Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to
believe
> that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General
> Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their thinking. However,
the
> exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the majority of his General
> Relativity work from these two men, the rest being taken from Grossmann.
> Hilbert submitted for publication, a week before Einstein completed his
> work, a paper which contained the correct field equations of General
> Relativity. What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same
> paper, with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have
> had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were
> Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not
necessary,
> for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own.
Both
> of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form of a
> lecture.
>> Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert
had
> presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert
> received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of
the
> treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent
a
> copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either
of
> the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an
> advance copy of his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that
> Einstein quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to
beat
> Hilbert to the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to
> belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in
> an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the
> mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his
work
> first.
>> Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher
> quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems
with
> assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that
> Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of
> the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the
work
> of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum
> mechanics. [Note: see critique].
>> That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the
> ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along.
> In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that
> "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré,
etc.,
> had created the foundations of the theory of relativity..."
>> However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The
Jewish
> media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted
> the work of the Jew Albert Einstein. As we mentioned earlier, this General
> Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein
> second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a massive
> object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars
> passing close to the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory.
This
> evidence supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the
> Jewish-controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up
> Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.
>> On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of
> which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe -
> Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force-feeding
of
> the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's
earlier
> 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator
> of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media,
in
> 1922, Einstein received the Nobel Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905
> regarding the photoelectric effect.
>> The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an
> important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been
> established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his
> image was promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed to
be
> today. As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World Zionism.
> The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to
> change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we
> ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues.
This
> is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of
> social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert
> to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a
> strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle names
were
> 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934, the
> day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as
> President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf
> Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in
> the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert
> receiving the credit he deserved.
>> The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either.
> This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German
> theologians, and during World War II he would stay in Germany throughout
the
> war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.
>> The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be
> heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to
> teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter
> expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the
> unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it
had
> been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.
>> The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius,
> even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it
> greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition
to
> describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are
> essential to modern chemistry. No, the Jews did not want Heisenberg
promoted
> as a genius because he would go on to head the German atomic bomb project
> and serve prison time after the war for his involvement with the Third
> Reich.
>> No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white
> Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even
> Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from
> which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to
erect
> Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often
> embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding
> the work he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh
> Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic
> denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the "energy of
the
> atom." The article says,
>> "But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that
> man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to drive a great
> steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance-then,
according
> to Einstein, you are wrong..."
>> Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had
> supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical
> research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear
energy.
> But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real attempts
> to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose -
> evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did
publish
> other articles after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least
one
> other person, and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do
> with the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the
> co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the
> pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.
>> In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a
> fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to promote
> Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain membership in
a
> Commission of the League of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein visits
> Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he becomes a founding member of
the
> Association of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break
> from his Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself
> scientifically by criticizing the work of Schrödinger and Heisenberg.
> Following a brief illness, he resumes his Zionistic agenda, wanting an
> independent Israel and at the same time a World Government.
>> In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he
> would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war
> against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was
> impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the request of other
> Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop
> an atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not Japan. Einstein would have no
> part in the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical,
> because he lacked the skills for either.
>> In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World
Government,
> with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push
continues
> through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been
instrumental
> in the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically,
> is offered the presidency of Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends his
> time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists such as
J.
> Robert Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to the
> McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue
> dies.
>> Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid
> statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation
> by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to promote the myth
of
> this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the men who
> knew better died off, the Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his
> myth and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew
> controlled Time magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century" at
the
> close of 1999. It may be demonstrated that the Jewish lies have become
more
> bold with the passage of time because Einstein was never named "Man of the
> Year" while he was alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he is
> named "Person of the Century."
>> Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the
> "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the
> Year" while he was still living by Time magazine, and according to a
> December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen over
Adolf
> Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that
would
> accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished
> third and was the top serious candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine
> dedicated to Einstein, which has articles by men with names like Isaacson,
> Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For
one,
> they found it necessary to include an article rationalizing why they did
not
> pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article
> by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of the theory of
> relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the things in this article, such
> as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before
> Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of relativity
> long before Einstein. Hawking also writes,
>> "Einstein...was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in
> Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich, who
> developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. ... Einstein
> was horrified by this ... Most scientists, however, accepted the validity
of
> the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with
> observations ... They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry,
> molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology
that
> has transformed the world in the past half-century."
>> This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of
> the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so
> stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern
> science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified field theory
which
> was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded"
> Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity
> and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the
> unified field theory, but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the
> least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused to believe in either
> quantum theory or the unified field theory.
>> To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most
ludicrous
> and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by
> Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners
of
> Time magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to an inventor
> or scientist, then the most obvious choice would have been men like
Hilbert,
> Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most
> fundamentally changed the landscape of 20th century science, then the
> obvious choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning
scientist
> invented the transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic
devices
> and computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and
watches,
> to the amazing computers which have allowed incomprehensible advances in
all
> fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms of science today
would
> be basically in the same place that they were in the late 1940s.
>> However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley
> because he spent the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the
> genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their
> sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews to financially
> destroy Shockley who founded the first company in the Silicon Valley, his
> hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff
> and used them to start Fairchild semiconductor, the company that today is
> known as Intel.
>> No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be
> recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German
scientists
> who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who
> was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not William
> Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and geneticists of our
time.
> Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who
> hated everything white.
>> After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and
> of the Germans in particular in the following statements. He was asked
what
> he thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war
> and said,
>> "The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since
1870...Behind
> the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had
in
> his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the
> possibility of misunderstanding. ... The Germans can be killed or
> constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic
> way of thinking and acting..."
>> Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that
> this is the only way that they can be kept in check. He is right about one
> thing, the Germans did knowingly support the cause of National Socialism,
> but what Einstein is attacking is Christianity, because it was
Christianity
> that led the German people to overwhelmingly support National Socialism.
It
> was the German Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of
> men like Karl Lueger that led the German people to their understanding of
> Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has recently shown the Christian basis of
> National Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary
> Germans and the Holocaust, and the book Why The Jews? by Prager and
> Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what the Jews call
> 'anti-Semitism.' Einstein understood this and Einstein, like all Jews,
hated
> Christianity. So what Einstein was really advocating was the killing and
> constraining of all true Christians, not just German Christians. This is
the
> true purpose and intent of Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was merely a
> tool of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end.
>> Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is the mortal
> enemy of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein, hated Nazi
> Germany so much, for National Socialist Germany advocated primitive,
> positive Christianity in the 24th point of its Party Platform.
>>>>>
