----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:16 PM
I found this and I thought it was interesting.
Lawdy be! A woman killed by her 4 pit bulls. Surprise, surprise. The pit
bull (American Staffordshire terrier) was bred for the purpose of fighting.
That means teeth, blood, torn flesh -- that sort of thing. "Pit", that's
their arena. "Bull" does not mean female. I guess our land of morons has
been seeing too many Disney movies. What in hell does an owner of such
animals think he is doing? I'll be nice to a pit bull, feed him oatmeal, and
he'll become a Chihuahua. It should never be forgotten, if one has the
brains to understand in the first place, that dogs are pack animals. One pit
bull per family is enough but add another, that's two Virginia, and the pack
instinct is amplified. When one has a pack of four, you are inviting
disaster, big time. The equation is simple. The more dogs, the less the
human influence.
Have you noticed that there are far fewer attacks by dogs, or simians, upon
males than there are upon children or women? There is another factor here
which the feminist crowd dislikes. Females, with their soft ways, are quite
effective with animals when it comes to herbivores, especially horses. Not
many females are in the horse 'breaking' business though. When it comes to
the fang crowd, any farmer knows that its the man who is most effective at
control. Trainers of African cats, lions etc., have told me that the female
voice will often set off a lion to attack. It appears that chauvinism exists
among carnivores also. If that can be proved, then maybe our feminists can
strive to outlaw Nature. When loving, the female voice is often quite
soothing, but when yapping, it remains one of the most irritating sounds on
earth
